toto
Active Member
1 Bloor St. East, seems to have spawned a number of slightly deformed offspring. Are the architects in this city that lacking in ideas, that they need rip off a rip off?
Codifying design
Peter Clewes, a partner with architectsAlliance and an architect who has designed his share of tall towers (most recently Peter Street Condos, the Four Seasons and Pier 27) shares Giancos’ concern.
“The danger is you impose a level of homogeneity that was imposed in a place like the Railway Lands,” notes Clewes, who designed several of the CityPlace towers.
He sees that condo cluster as a cautionary tale that underscores the perils of overly controlled design.
“You get this field of towers with the same facing condition and all with roughly the same floor plates and heights,” he says. “And it’s this level of consistency and banality that really isn’t the city.
“What’s interesting about the city,” Clewes continues, “is that it develops incrementally over time and is kind of a messy growth, but that makes it interesting. You get these conflicts and juxtapositions that make it look organic, as opposed to something that’s planned.
“When you try and codify design, you lose what makes Toronto potentially interesting.”
Awful. Absolutely awful.
Bland, uninspired bore that will destroy the classic view of the skyline from the islands. Clewes needs to go back to kindergarten and get a refill on some creativity.
but nobody wants to step up. The boom will be over in a few short years, and Toronto will be left with cookie cutter condos for generations to come.