thecharioteer
Senior Member
Re: The Star article in today's paper:
http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/05/08/towers-find-friends-on-toronto-district-school-board.html
One of the most poorly written and researched articles in recent memory. She writes that the site is 32,420 SM?
Never knew that Church and Carlton was a neighborhood "dominated by smaller mid-rises" (Radio City?). Loved the shadow study that showed no shadows on the schoolyard. The Star is the last place to find out how the dysfunctional approval process really works in this city.
http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/05/08/towers-find-friends-on-toronto-district-school-board.html
One of the most poorly written and researched articles in recent memory. She writes that the site is 32,420 SM?
Never knew that Church and Carlton was a neighborhood "dominated by smaller mid-rises" (Radio City?). Loved the shadow study that showed no shadows on the schoolyard. The Star is the last place to find out how the dysfunctional approval process really works in this city.
Last edited: