Toronto Regent Park: Daniels on Parliament | 88.25m | 25s | Daniels | Superkül

The blue walls with the openings at ground level look like...a BMO atm? A friend of mine involved with the Cabbagetown BIA mentionned the LCBO as one of the potential tenants to replace the rather small store further north on Parliament but maybe it was wishful thinking. Curious to see which businesses will open.
 
Ground realm has some decent detail and articulation (plus the blue wall really pops)

IMG_8510.jpeg
IMG_8511.jpeg
IMG_8512.jpeg
IMG_8513.jpeg
IMG_8516.jpeg
IMG_8517.jpeg
IMG_8524.jpeg
IMG_8519.jpeg
View attachment 685172View attachment 685173
IMG_8526.jpeg
 
Was there not supposed to be additional space apportioned on the ROW for a bidirectional cycle track on the south side of Gerrard as apart of this project?
 
Last edited:
Looking good. I am disappointed that we didn’t take the opportunity to push back the building site’s northern edge and put a dual track bike lane and wide sidewalk along Gerrard’s south side from Parliament to River.
Was this not planned as apart of the larger Gerrard East Complete Street? What happened?
 
Was this not planned as apart of the larger Gerrard East Complete Street? What happened?
I assume the same happened on Gerrard as on Dundas, where instead of taking the opportunity of a lifetime (how often does one get to play Sim City and flatten a entire area) to widen the road-sidewalk space so to keep two lanes of vehicular traffic and add separated bike lanes and wide sidewalks, some planner at the city had an afterthought to instead remove a lane of traffic in both directions and leave the road-sidewalk space the same width.
 
I assume the same happened on Gerrard as on Dundas, where instead of taking the opportunity of a lifetime (how often does one get to play Sim City and flatten a entire area) to widen the road-sidewalk space so to keep two lanes of vehicular traffic and add separated bike lanes and wide sidewalks, some planner at the city had an afterthought to instead remove a lane of traffic in both directions and leave the road-sidewalk space the same width.
But all documents I am aware of indicate that the former option (reconfiguration of ROW via expansion on southside) was/is being pursed. Please take a look at transportation services Gerrard Street East | Complete Street Connection. The document's introduction reads:

Gerrard St E from Parliament St to River St south side will be completely rebuilt through the Regent Park redevelopment over the next 5 years and beyond.

Further, slide 56 includes a street-mix representation of the ROW, which indicates four mixed-traffic lanes and bidirectional cycling facilities on the south side:

1765317531843.png


But having walked/biked by over the past weeks, it appears there is not enough room to accommodate a proper sidewalk and 3m of cycling facilities. I wonder what has changed. Are they planning on ripping the road up, narrowing the existing lanes, and reconfiguring the road once this is all done ?
 
But having walked/biked by over the past weeks, it appears there is not enough room to accommodate a proper sidewalk and 3m of cycling facilities. I wonder what has changed. Are they planning on ripping the road up, narrowing the existing lanes, and reconfiguring the road once this is all done ?

There is approximately 7.7M from the curb to the face of the building.

The curb lane of Gerrard here is ~3.5M wide (which provides at least 0.2M of additional space.

I believe there is sufficient room here to incorporate a bi-directional bike path of 3M, and I assume the design has been laid out this way pending road reconstruction and further developments along Gerrard.

****

Bit of digging.

Gerrard, Parliament to River, is currently listed for on-street Bikeway construction in 2029.

To be clear, this not yet approved through Council, so far as I recall, and is subject to future funding. But is listed in the program.

I know @TwoWheelPoli was asking about that......
 

Back
Top