This is off-topic, but hits home. My uncle is a medic, and firefighters are not dispatched to all calls related to medical emergencies. Their union boss would like them to be, though. I have nothing against firefighters (I am related to a few) but paramedics specialize in responding to emergency calls. That is literally all that they are trained to do. While firefighters do receive first aid training, it is more limited than what a paramedic receives. Firefighters should only be providing medical intervention if a paramedic is unavailable to, or if they cannot respond in time. Those issues can be easily solved by better funding for EMS, which has been woefully underfunded for years in comparison to the fire service.
AoD, it is pretty funny that you posted that article, as
today, the OPFFA laid out a new proposal that would see firefighters respond to more medical interventions.
The OPFFA likes to position itself as the best provider for expanded medical EMS, by making claims that paramedics don't respond as fast or are underfunded - both of which ignore the fact that those issues could be solved by more funding for EMS (and hospitals, to reduce dwell times, as paramedics remain in hospital to assist triage, making offloading one of the big causes of delays), as opposed to Fire.
Their proposal is that firefighters will receive an additional 20-hours of medical training, which will somehow make them equivalent of a paramedic who must complete 2 years of school, 500 hours of on-the-job training, and pass a yearly medical exam.
Does it make sense to pour additional money into the Fire Department to try and turn them into paramedics to respond to medical interventions, when we already have paramedics trained to respond to medical interventions, and could pour additional money into the service to increasing their staffing levels and reduce delays? No, it does not.