urbandreamer
recession proof
6 December 2012: Looks amazing.
Toronto Post Loft Condos | 25.16m | 6s | Condoman | Standard Practice
- Thread starter Andrew3D
- Start date
TheKingEast
Senior Member
Neilas?
Have they even completed a project yet? Looking at their site and all their future projects gave me a good chuckle.
Have they even completed a project yet? Looking at their site and all their future projects gave me a good chuckle.
Ryan_T
Senior Member
ChesterCopperpot
Senior Member
Apologies for the 4 year bump - but it looks like some action here?????
Last edited:
Yoshimura
Active Member
It's up for sale.
The description says Official Plan Amendment For The Immediate Area Supports Developments Up To Six (6) Storeys.
The Ashbridge Precinct urban design guidelines says:
• Commercial-Residential densities that range from 2.0 - 2.5
• The maximum permitted heights in the study area are 12.0 metres and 14.0 metres (approximately 4 storeys).
The harmonized City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board. It includes the same permissions as 438-86 for the study area.
There are two properties that are exempt from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 and are subject to the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86.
Which is correct? 6 or 4 storeys?
The description says Official Plan Amendment For The Immediate Area Supports Developments Up To Six (6) Storeys.
The Ashbridge Precinct urban design guidelines says:
• Commercial-Residential densities that range from 2.0 - 2.5
• The maximum permitted heights in the study area are 12.0 metres and 14.0 metres (approximately 4 storeys).
The harmonized City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 is currently under appeal at the Ontario Municipal Board. It includes the same permissions as 438-86 for the study area.
There are two properties that are exempt from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 and are subject to the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86.
Which is correct? 6 or 4 storeys?
Derived from http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87229.pdf, page 36:
4 storeys along the Queen sidewalk with a 6-storey peak behind, or:
4 storeys, 14 metres along the street, with the possibility of step backs up to 6 storeys, 20 metres, where the lot depth allows the building to terrace down from that below a 45° angular plane to the distant edge of the rear lane. (The image from that page will help explain that!)
Meanwhile, the Cubs just won the World Series.
42
4 storeys along the Queen sidewalk with a 6-storey peak behind, or:
4 storeys, 14 metres along the street, with the possibility of step backs up to 6 storeys, 20 metres, where the lot depth allows the building to terrace down from that below a 45° angular plane to the distant edge of the rear lane. (The image from that page will help explain that!)
Meanwhile, the Cubs just won the World Series.
42
torplanner
Active Member
Lenser
Senior Member
Been waiting for that hole to be filled for quite some time. Don't really trust the render at this stage of the game.
PMT
Senior Member
1249 QUEEN ST E
Ward 32 - Tor & E.York District
►View All Properties
Proposal for rezoning related to a mid-rise 6 storey mixed-use building containing 29 dwelling units and commercial space at grade with two levels of below grade parking
Proposed Use --- # of Storeys --- # of Units ---
Applications:
Type Number Date Submitted Status
Rezoning 17 247432 STE 32 OZ Oct 13, 2017 Application Received
Ward 32 - Tor & E.York District
►View All Properties
Proposal for rezoning related to a mid-rise 6 storey mixed-use building containing 29 dwelling units and commercial space at grade with two levels of below grade parking
Proposed Use --- # of Storeys --- # of Units ---
Applications:
Type Number Date Submitted Status
Rezoning 17 247432 STE 32 OZ Oct 13, 2017 Application Received
PMT
Senior Member
TheKingEast
Senior Member
"Condoman" really? 
someMidTowner
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It gets even better: howardthecondoman.com/"Condoman" really?
This is the same URL as the contact email appearing on planning documents, so this is the guy!
Last edited:
Orson
New Member
Holy crap that was the best worst website evar
ADRM
Senior Member
Sounds like he's got this one all wrapped up.
A Torontonian Now
Senior Member
For those who haven't taken the time to click on the link:
