Toronto PJ Condos | 156.96m | 48s | Pinnacle | Hariri Pontarini

IMG_6237.JPG
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6237.JPG
    IMG_6237.JPG
    2.8 MB · Views: 537
Someone above mentioned the north platform / cement area is being built temporarily for construction trailers and such? Hmm...I don't know. The north side seems to follows the contours in the rendering, no? Rendering below from Pinnacle.

Untitled.png
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    2.6 MB · Views: 560
That's a heritage concrete pad, so they have to keep it in place while…

ahhhh, crappy joke not worth completing.

The excavation will extend underneath the entire property—deep one too, six storeys—so I'm not sure what's going on with that pad at the north end.

Curious. :confused:

42
 
I bet the city didn't allow lane closures so they are building the pad for construction staging. It will then eventually be integrated into the final structure. My guess at least.

It seems to be becoming more common, they did it at 50 Wellesley too.
 
It's funny, looking back at the last couple pages of construction photos, I see that it must be that way, but I am surprised that what's under that pad isn't more robust. The soldier piles are in all right around the perimeter, but I don't see a column to support the end of the podium. Obviously it will be added in as the space underneath is excavated, as those little shoring poles won't do the trick for long. Anyway, innnnnnteresting…

42
 
The dataBase file has just been updated with a new more precise height based on the Site Plan documents filed with the City, 156.95m to the top of the mechanical. That rounds to 515 feet, and 157 m in the thread title.
Turner Fleischer added as Architect of Record, and Janet Rosenberg & Studio added for Landscape Architecture, which will extend the plan from Pinnacle on Adelaide across the street.

42

@DonValleyRainbow
 
March 28
Seeing the north site area, 2 things came to mind; One going to put the sales office back in, but most likely will be used to house the construction office with the last being the option. Since the city wants to reduce lanes closure, this will become the future way of doing things. This method has already being used on a number projects over the last decade.
32900644784_d78190a03b_b.jpg

33702946616_7e20355d38_b.jpg

33702966106_903b6f7a5e_b.jpg

33702959696_33017771e6_b.jpg

33702970816_9dde43690e_b.jpg

33587187132_552e4bae63_b.jpg

33614487311_a9026e0439_b.jpg

33702972866_f94d762876_b.jpg
 
I wonder if the owner of 263 Adelaide (currently seeking redevelopment) will recreate the 'Forte' throw up when they reconstruct the building. I somehow doubt it...
 
Digging deeper, from yesterday:

IMG_1738.jpg
IMG_1739.jpg


42
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1738.jpg
    IMG_1738.jpg
    481.9 KB · Views: 761
  • IMG_1739.jpg
    IMG_1739.jpg
    533.6 KB · Views: 509

Back
Top