robmausser
Senior Member
So it’ll be like an RT with higher frequencies to make up for the lower capacity.
RT with higher frequencies and probably trains as long as possible. 6 or 8 car trains.
So it’ll be like an RT with higher frequencies to make up for the lower capacity.
And how much will be outside to save on time and costs is yet to be determined.
That doesn't sound like a very good idea.
Metrolinx is full of bad ideas.
Exactly! Why build a toy when for a fraction more, you can build something real. London would not build the Docklands Light Railway today as they did initially. They'd build it much closer to a full 'metro' model. Or even larger.
The "DLR" has been mentioned in a number of news reports as to what the "Ontario Line" is to emulate.
Beware!
One of many articles on this:
https://notquitetangible.blogspot.com/2019/01/extending-docklands-light-railway.html
also:
“The original 13km, 13-station system cost £77m, but in the following 20 years over £1bn was spent on upgrades and extensions.”
Docklands Light Railway Capacity Upgrade - Railway Technology
A subway would be the best solution for future capacity (which may come far sooner than we think) and would be better for future expansion too.
Is the proposed technology higher capacity than the Crosstown? If so, then in my opinion it's less of a mismatch than using heavy rail for Sheppard East...
Which raises a number of other questions, lol, not least Metrolinx' latest idea to *limit* the number of transferring TTC/GO fare paying passengers onto UPX.We've seen this layout proposed by Metrolinx before (terminating at Exhibition Place). The primary intention was to terminate GO lines at Bathurst/Spadina and dump passengers onto the DRL into downtown.
Honestly if you have a better idea to deal with the overcrowding at Union station id love to hear it.
The only way it will work however is if people getting off on the Spadina GO station are allowed to ride the Ontario Line into downtown for free.
Just like the Mascouche Line and the REM in Montreal. No different.
Wow look, a rapid transit map that includes GO lines! So it can be done. Someone alert the TTC!
To be fair (yes I know, being fair to Ford is a stretch, but humour me here), it does say "Ontario Place/Exhibition". So it's possible that the station would actually be at the Exhibition GO station. It would provide extra rapid transit options to Liberty Village and GO commuters coming from the west. And it could divert large numbers of riders away from Union, as has been discussed over the last few pages. I agree that the station at Ontario Place would be dumb, but at Exhibition would make a lot more sense.Only a very large development would justify having a terminal station at Ontario Place.
I'd say that RER is more crucial than any transit project apart from the relief line. Er, Ontario line.Interesting as Sheppard is still left as 'Sheppard East extension' instead of a 'Sheppard East LRT'- are we going to see a subway extension there?
I think this also dovetails perfectly into Doug Ford's interest in Ontario Place's redevelopment. What better to make Ontario Place instantly more 'developable' than to have a subway running through it?
Overall, sentiments are in the middle- but the bigger question remains about RER, which I think is still crucial, perhaps more than some of the other ongoing transit projects.
Subway demand isn't determined by the terminals.It doesn't need subway capacity if the terminus is Ontario Place, to be frank.
Crush peaks on this line may be a little bit of a squeeze soon after opening day, which is lamentable. Is it warranted though if it means that the line actually gets built?
So long as capacity targets the 25,000pphpd range it'll probably be fine. Future capacity can be met with a second 25,000pphpd line (start that EA in 2030) running down Vic Park and along Wellington.
The savings seems pretty minor though; the provincial portion of the savings (1/3rd overall) is pretty small at $1B.
We're paying a premium to build heavy rail in the suburbs when we could do the same here for relatively little more.
Let's not forget that Ford-produced transit plans are notoriously underpriced. Just 5 years ago they proposed 32km of new subways (not underground LRTs) for $9 billion.
As easy as they made it sound at the news conference, I can imagine this going well beyond the $10.9 billion price tag.