Johnny Au
Superstar
February 5, 2025:
Yonge and Bloor (aka the Golden Corner or the Champagne Corner):
Yonge and Bloor (aka the Golden Corner or the Champagne Corner):
Well, it's almost sacrilege to speak unkind words about this project. It's not ugly, but it isn't all that pretty either imho. The hype piles high here.I wouldn't say ugly - but I'm definitely not blown away by the design...
Take away the supertall aspect, and take away the "Foster & Partners" name, and it's a pretty bland building that looks like another downtown office.
There almost feels like an expectation on this site, that we HAVE to like this building. Group-think if you ask me.
I think it looks great design wise but it should’ve been a lighter (more golden) colourWell, it's almost sacrilege to speak unkind words about this project. It's not ugly, but it isn't all that pretty either imho. The hype piles high here.
Unpopular opinion , but I wish Mizrahi had gone with RAMSA (their original plan) instead of Foster. Itd have been a much simpler, faster build.I wouldn't say ugly - but I'm definitely not blown away by the design...
Take away the supertall aspect, and take away the "Foster & Partners" name, and it's a pretty bland building that looks like another downtown office.
There almost feels like an expectation on this site, that we HAVE to like this building. Group-think if you ask me.
I concur, I don't think anyone really has claimed this is a masterpiece. It's a tower that a lot of love and thought in it's materials and presentation, that is clearly evident. It's also very tall and poised to break a record in being so. And it uses a fairly unconventional structure to hold itself up...so yeah, it's standoffish as well. But the Taj Mahal it is not. Nor does it really come close to our own newly minted Aqualuna at Bayside for that fact, IMO.To say it’s awful is as much a hyperbole as saying it’s going to win the Pritzker Prize. I hope you don’t live in Toronto, because if you think this is awful, I don’t know how you cope with the spandrel fest that literally is all over the city.
Taste is subjective, but if someone claims this tower is uglier than Social and 365 Church, I’d suggest they go for a cornea transplant …I concur, I don't think anyone really has claimed this is a masterpiece. It's a tower that a lot of love and thought in it's materials and presentation, that is clearly evident. It's also very tall and poised to break a record in being so. And it uses a fairly unconventional structure to hold itself up...so yeah, it's standoffish as well. But the Taj Mahal it is not. Nor does it really come close to our own newly minted Aqualuna at Bayside for that fact, IMO.
Outside of this, what we think of this tower is mostly subjective here. That is, some folks will never appreciate it for whatever reasons. And that's fine. However, the majority of readers likely favour this tower over something of the likes of 365 Church or that Social at Church + Dundas . And that's something fairly undeniable.
This is the thing that should be important in this type of conversation: Because I dislike something doesn't mean it's awful. For example, I loath pickles and Air Supply, does not mean they are bad or terrible...it's just I am not into them.Taste is subjective, but if someone claims this tower is uglier than Social and 365 Church, I’d suggest they go for a cornea transplant …
I know Yonge street slopes upwards but this thing has to be taller than aura now, the slope shouldn’t be making this look that much tallerFeb 9 2025.
Ask and you shall receive!
View attachment 630440View attachment 630441View attachment 630442View attachment 630443View attachment 630444View attachment 630445