Toronto Lower Don Lands Redevelopment | ?m | ?s | Waterfront Toronto

The aftermath:

1721230295216.jpeg


‘Land o’ Lakes’:

IMG_4580.jpeg


Murky and some flotsam and jetsam:

IMG_4581.jpeg


IMG_4584.jpeg


Appears to be the birth of a new path near the north end of Lemon.

IMG_4582.jpeg


Finessing the edges…

IMG_4583.jpeg


Meanwhile near Orange, life (and tree planting) must go on…

IMG_4593.jpeg


Surveying the debris…

IMG_4595.jpeg


IMG_4596.jpeg


They will undoubtedly have to clean this up…

IMG_4589.jpeg


IMG_4592.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4579.jpeg
    IMG_4579.jpeg
    211.8 KB · Views: 20
  • 1721230162308.jpeg
    1721230162308.jpeg
    205.9 KB · Views: 17
Last edited:
Speaking of, was Evergreen Brickworks flooded yesterday? Any pics?

I remember walking though there things like power outlets etc are all mounted 5 feet up the walls and some original pillars have a red line on them showing how high a flood they expect to roll through there every few decades.

Last night went and looked at Bayview & Dundas. There were fish as long as an adult's arm splashing around in the water covering Bayview. Some homeless guys that live under the bridge were trying to grab them. Funny to be able to say you caught fish on the Bayview Extension.

1721231923172.png


Credit Donna Chong - Beauty of the Don
 
Great shots of waters around Lemon & Cherry. I forget the scale of the river always looking at it from the drone. It really is big. Seeing the guy in the boat puts it in perspective. I guess all that debris floats so it's relatively easy to clean up, but will they have to eventually dredge the new river at some point years from now? And how do they do that without disturbing all those HUGE stones they put down?
 
Great shots of waters around Lemon & Cherry. I forget the scale of the river always looking at it from the drone. It really is big. Seeing the guy in the boat puts it in perspective. I guess all that debris floats so it's relatively easy to clean up, but will they have to eventually dredge the new river at some point years from now? And how do they do that without disturbing all those HUGE stones they put down?

The sediment management area now under construction (by the Don yard) widen the river and slows down the flow to allow for suspended matter to settle, making it easier to deal with.

As to dredging the new river - the protective geotextile liner isolating the bed of the river from the contaminated soils underneath might be a challenge. I think the river was engineered in a way that would "flush" the deposits?

AoD
 
Great shots of waters around Lemon & Cherry. I forget the scale of the river always looking at it from the drone. It really is big. Seeing the guy in the boat puts it in perspective. I guess all that debris floats so it's relatively easy to clean up, but will they have to eventually dredge the new river at some point years from now? And how do they do that without disturbing all those HUGE stones they put down?
I think the new river bed has been designed to 'self-scour just like real rivers do. The reason the Keating Channel needed to be dredged was that the water volumes /speeds were not strong enough to do this and the channel was poorly designed with tall straight walls that did not cause 'eddies'. They never, as far as I know, dredged further north than the Lake Shore bridge and do not expect to need to dredge the new valley either. I think they (WT) plan to do a major dredge of the Keating in next few months and then only need to deal with it occasionally - Ports Toronto have said they will not do more dredging there , so if any is done it will be a City responsibility.
 
More Pictures of the Brickworks:

1721252939150.png


1721252957513.png


1721252970446.png


1721252990914.png


1721253023214.png


1721253038889.png


1721253055852.png


Pictures are from Evergreen Brickwork's Facebook page:


Of note, they had 113 campers (kids) at the park at the time the flooding began. Happy to report, no injuries.
 

paywall bypass: https://archive.is/vAW8D

The whole article is so alarmist. Just goofy.

Take this line for instance: The scenes were harrowing.

Really? Harrowing?

Screenshot 2024-07-17 at 5.51.15 PM.png

People intentionally drove their car into waist deep water that was completely still and then they had to walk out or be walked out by a fireman. About as 'harrowing' as a dirty wading pool.
 
Last edited:
The whole article is so alarmist. Just goofy. Take this line for instance: The scenes were harrowing.

Really?

View attachment 581200
People intentionally drove their car into waist deep water that was completely still and then they had to walk out or be walked out by a fireman. About as 'harrowing' as a dirty wading pool.
I think Toronto is so bereft of natural disasters that local media loves to exaggerate the ones we do have.
 
The whole article is so alarmist. Just goofy. Take this line for instance: The scenes were harrowing.

Really?

I'm happy enough to agree that some of the superlatives overdone and that's fairly media 101............I mean at least it wasn't BlogTO..... 'Toronto Terrified by T-Storms" still....

People intentionally drove their car into waist deep water that was completely still and then they had to walk out or be walked out by a fireman. About as 'harrowing' as a dirty wading pool.

However, this is a bit much the other way.

Sure some people were stupid, though I think you under estimate substantially the speed at which the water arrived and rose.

Below is a model showing something like what happened yesterday, but not the actual event:


Still Image from same:

1721253901419.png


Look at the speed at which the river moves to maximum discharge.

Its important to realize that the river snapped large hydro polls and lifted cars........

If someone was caught by a current undertow the result could have been more than harrowing.

It just so happens, no one was.

But worth adding a similar flash flood in Nova Scotia this week killed a teenage boy, so its not a stretch to speak of the danger here.
 

Back
Top