Toronto Lower Don Lands Redevelopment | ?m | ?s | Waterfront Toronto

There's a nice view from the south side and if you're someone who likes taking pictures, it's annoying. Like your reply.
 
  • Like
Reactions: max
GameOnBrad said:
My problem with ALL the Portlands bridges so far is the lazy design where they put sidewalks on both sides or bike lanes on both sides but not both.
Click to expand...
It's not entirely lazy design, the problem is that these bridges are all supposed to be twinned in the very distant future.

GameOnBrad said:
Ookwemin Minising:

The Cherry Street Bridge, bike lanes on one side, sidewalks on both sides.
Click to expand...
This is the only complete crossing in the Port Lands. Both LRT and road bridges have been installed.
GameOnBrad said:
The Don River Bridge, bike lanes on both sides, sidewalks on one side.
Click to expand...
Assuming you're talking about the Commissioner St. bridge over the Don here. Future plans call for an LRT bridge to connect to Leslie St. and the Leslie Barns. Very distant future plans.
GameOnBrad said:
The Lake Shore Blvd. Bridge: Are there going to be bike lanes on both sides? From what I could see, with the pictures I took, there is no bike lane on the south side of that bridge, only on the north side.
Click to expand...
If there were a bike path on the south side, it would dead end at the edge of the bridge, there is zero space between the roadway, the pillars for the Gardiner (which will be removed in a decade I guess), and the Keating channel.
GameOnBrad said:
It's literally the reason cyclists keep biking down Cherry Street on the east side instead of using the bike lanes on the west side. It's also the reason pedestrians keep walking across the south side of the Don River bridge (on the bike lane), in Ookwemin Minising, instead of crossing the road and using the sidewalk on the north side.

It's really, REALLY, lazy design work.
Click to expand...
So it's not the design work, but I think temporary bridges or expansions on the existing bridges should have been built, because some of these bridges won't be twinned for decades.

Also, if it's a bidirectional bike lane, why would they place it on both sides of the road? A cyclist riding on a sidewalk when there is a bidirectional lane on the other side is just laziness. Lazy cyclists, not lazy design.
 
evandyk said:
40 year old company is bankrupt within 9 years of being bought by a private equity fund. Where have we heard this story before?
Click to expand...
...replacing seasoned engineers with MBA's? >.<
 
GameOnBrad said:
View attachment 670639

There is literally no space whatsoever on this side for a sidewalk. The Blvd, the supports for the Gardiner and the Keating Channel take up all the space once you get off this bridge on the south side. Maybe if they place some kind of concrete overhang on the Keating Channel maybe? The old ramp above it appears to be being dismantled, so maybe that will make some room for a sidewalk.

View attachment 670640

I walked around to the east side of the bridge as well. They have some paving on the side of the road but I could not get close to the bridge.

View attachment 670641
Click to expand...

I have pictures from 2017 showing how little space there is, but turns out I archived that thread. I'll have to come back later and post them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As promised. I guess this qualifies as historic footage...holy cripes.

IMG_20171223_114050.jpg



IMG_20171223_114759.jpg



IMG_20171223_115216.jpg


IMG_20171223_115223.jpg


IMG_20171223_115521.jpg


IMG_20171223_115543.jpg


DSCN5378.JPG


Bonus pic of the Hearn.

DSCN5405.JPG
 
...thought that was ash falling from our forrested fire skies for a moment. >.<
 
I agree an odd spot for a car dealership. However despite all the conversations about automobiles pro or con electric or gas. Automobiles are still BIG business and will continue to be big business. Plus some people will need cars to get around for work or they're disabled, or elderly, have children, whatever the reason. I am looking forward to see what the Porsche people will bring here. I'm looking forward to the first residences being built here too. This will be a very choice place to live int the (near) future.
 
LUVIT! said:
I agree an odd spot for a car dealership. However despite all the conversations about automobiles pro or con electric or gas. Automobiles are still BIG business and will continue to be big business. Plus some people will need cars to get around for work or they're disabled, or elderly, have children, whatever the reason. I am looking forward to see what the Porsche people will bring here. I'm looking forward to the first residences being built here too. This will be a very choice place to live int the (near) future.
Click to expand...
Hmmmmm. It WILL be a great place to live (eventually) but currently has poor transit and no stores - I will be amazed to see housing going in near the Porsche dealers for decades - as far as I know the land south of the Ship Channel is only barely serviced with water and sewers and that will need to be greatly improved first.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top