Kiwi
Active Member
Could trains oust lanes on Main?
Transit plan would hijack car lanes on major arteries
April 15, 2008
Nicole MacIntyre
A suburban councillor is warning the city's plans to reduce lanes on its main arteries to make room for rapid transit will provoke a "rebellion" among car drivers.
"It's absolutely ridiculous," Councillor Lloyd Ferguson declared yesterday after reviewing the transit proposal.
Preliminary plans show parts of Main and King streets would be reduced from four traffic lanes to two wider lanes to create exclusive space for rapid buses or a light rail system. A fifth lane, now devoted to unloading and parking, would remain.
"Where are the vehicles supposed to go?" asked Ferguson, predicting mass congestion.
But Scott Stewart, general manager of public works, said the city must make significant changes if it is going to achieve its goal of reducing car trips by 20 per cent over the next few decades. "It's about having a vision. We're not talking about traffic now. We're talking about traffic in 15 to 20 years."
The city is in the early stages of planning a rapid transit system for the lower city and the Mountain. Staff plan to consult with the public this spring about the two transit options -- rapid buses in dedicated lanes or a light rail line.
The city would prefer to keep transit separate from other vehicles to ensure a clear path for buses or light rail, an advantage staff hope would make transit more attractive.
After council picks a preferred transit option later this year, it will take at least two years for an environmental assessment and planning to be completed.
Mayor Fred Eisenberger has already thrown his support behind a light rail system in the lower city.
"We should aspire high," he said, noting there's hope the province will pay to build the system.
Transit plan would hijack car lanes on major arteries
April 15, 2008
Nicole MacIntyre
A suburban councillor is warning the city's plans to reduce lanes on its main arteries to make room for rapid transit will provoke a "rebellion" among car drivers.
"It's absolutely ridiculous," Councillor Lloyd Ferguson declared yesterday after reviewing the transit proposal.
Preliminary plans show parts of Main and King streets would be reduced from four traffic lanes to two wider lanes to create exclusive space for rapid buses or a light rail system. A fifth lane, now devoted to unloading and parking, would remain.
"Where are the vehicles supposed to go?" asked Ferguson, predicting mass congestion.
But Scott Stewart, general manager of public works, said the city must make significant changes if it is going to achieve its goal of reducing car trips by 20 per cent over the next few decades. "It's about having a vision. We're not talking about traffic now. We're talking about traffic in 15 to 20 years."
The city is in the early stages of planning a rapid transit system for the lower city and the Mountain. Staff plan to consult with the public this spring about the two transit options -- rapid buses in dedicated lanes or a light rail line.
The city would prefer to keep transit separate from other vehicles to ensure a clear path for buses or light rail, an advantage staff hope would make transit more attractive.
After council picks a preferred transit option later this year, it will take at least two years for an environmental assessment and planning to be completed.
Mayor Fred Eisenberger has already thrown his support behind a light rail system in the lower city.
"We should aspire high," he said, noting there's hope the province will pay to build the system.