ProjectEnd
Superstar
Sure, but the entire existence of 'planning'' both as a profession and as a body of rules, is fundamentally to deal with the disastrous wounds the car has inflicted, and continues to inflict, on cities. Land values have always been speculative, just now the exponential rise in the last few years has made many things unworkable and we now have to try and claw back all density possible.
It is rational to have wider sidewalks where there's more density, which brings us back to my original point: increase sidewalks by taking away road space and introducing setbacks at grade, then give that space back in the form of an additional floor on top. I can guarantee that if that were the 'agreement', there isn't a developer in town who wouldn't go for it.
It is rational to have wider sidewalks where there's more density, which brings us back to my original point: increase sidewalks by taking away road space and introducing setbacks at grade, then give that space back in the form of an additional floor on top. I can guarantee that if that were the 'agreement', there isn't a developer in town who wouldn't go for it.