Undead
Senior Member
How many material choices do you want?
DS: Yes.
DS: Yes.
Oh yeah, let's just destroy the entire gay village for some condos with generic retail!Why is O'Grady's being saved? Is it not part of the assembly? Can't they induce the owners to sell? It's a major lost opportunity not to bring this right to the corner of Maitland. That windowless party wall is crap.
100% agree. The comment about just getting rid of O'Grady's so ridiculously tone deaf and highlights the ignorance that some people have on this thread towards development without and consideration for actual livability or cultural history of the neighbourhoods these buildings occupy.Oh yeah, let's just destroy the entire gay village for some condos with generic retail!
That said, I agree the end wall is crap. And it's highly unlikely nothing of that scale is going to be built on the O'Gradys site anyway, so it should have windows. But overall I wouldn't say having a nicely resolved frontage on Maitland is worth getting rid of 3 major establishments in the village, we're already losing 2 to this mess. Plus no way will whatever would get built along Maitland have the vibrancy of the patio that is currently there. Maybe it would make this building better resolved, but it would be worse for the neighbourhood in every way.
BTW, I lived in the village for a decade and I live close by today. I'm intimately aware of its livability and cultural history. That being said, O'Grady's needs to go. A new building is coming whether we like it or not. It might as well be the best it can be. O'Grady's is turning it into an unsightly mess. The performative deference to Cruz/Tango is largely to blame--there's no way the future condo-dwellers are going to let them operate longterm--but O"Grady's is making a bad situation a whole lot worse, with that ridiculous, overbearing party wall. Give them dibs on the new corner retail space and design it in a way that allows them to have a generous patio.100% agree. The comment about just getting rid of O'Grady's so ridiculously tone deaf and highlights the ignorance that some people have on this thread towards development without and consideration for actual livability or cultural history of the neighbourhoods these buildings occupy.
…which is wonderful on Casey House, and may not be a disaster here that some are predicting.Looks like someone saw the AIDS-quilt facade that HPA designed for Casey House and decided to mimic it.
PB34.3 | ACTION | | | Ward: 13 |
508 and 510 Church Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act See: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2022.PB34.3 |
The Diamond + Schmitt Architects-designed 506 Church Street is a proposed 14-storey, 160-unit condo located just south of Maitland Street in downtown Toronto. It has received approval to move forward and sales should launch next year.