jackattack
Active Member
How it looks among the 157m "table top" (400 King W highlighted in bright red)
Last edited:
Still not too late to throw a bunch of 200+ metre bldgs. and maybe even a super tall in between to change thatKinda seems like maybe the City should have realized their policies were leading to bad outcomes and made some revisions around planning in the Entertainment District sometime along the way so we didn't end up in this situation.
The tabletop is pretty solidly broken at this point but it’s not because the city changed its mind, it was broken through a series of LPAT decisions (and the city approving Mirvish Gehry).Kinda seems like maybe the City should have realized their policies were leading to bad outcomes and made some revisions around planning in the Entertainment District sometime along the way so we didn't end up in this situation.
@innsertnamehere's answer goes some in filling in the history, but stops short of saying…Kinda seems like maybe the City should have realized their policies were leading to bad outcomes and made some revisions around planning in the Entertainment District sometime along the way so we didn't end up in this situation.
well what happened is then the city refused to increase the "clothesline" to reflect the change, and in some desperate attempt to keep the pointless "clothesline" policy, refused to approve anything over 157m, perhaps inadvertently changing it from a clothesline to a tabletop.@innsertnamehere's answer goes some in filling in the history, but stops short of saying…
The City never wanted a tabletop. The City wanted a "clothesline" that would theoretically enhance the height peak at King and Bay, with the buildings getting shorter as they got closer to Spadina. Then the City allowed Festival Tower at the tiff.Bell Lightbox to be built taller than they envisioned in their plan in exchange for the public benefit there. Other developments challenged that, saying "if they got 157 metres, we want 157 metres" to which the OMB said "sure, you deserve the same height even if you don't provide similar benefits" and THAT's what set up the tabletop, not the City but the OMB.
42
Usually I’m unsympathetic towards Toronto Planning, but I can totally understand why this would rub people in the department the wrong way and cause future intransigence. It’s like Planning tried to institute a density bonus and now the city gets no public benefits out of it.Other developments challenged that, saying "if they got 157 metres, we want 157 metres" to which the OMB said "sure, you deserve the same height even if you don't provide similar benefits"
Yes, once the City allowed more (at Duncan and Adelaide) and the LPAT granted more (at Wellington and Blue Jays Way), newer ones are going taller again. Back before though, everyone got 157 because the OMB was going to hand out to everyone whatever height the City allowed as the tallest in the area. More rules and regs (with more nuances) are bringing things higher in certain spots as well, like at 212 King West.well what happened is then the city refused to increase the "clothesline" to reflect the change, and in some desperate attempt to keep the pointless "clothesline" policy, refused to approve anything over 157m, perhaps inadvertently changing it from a clothesline to a tabletop.
Lots of blame to go around I guess? It is what it is, and it's more or less gone now. Most recent proposals in the entertainment district exceed 157m.
@innsertnamehere's answer goes some in filling in the history, but stops short of saying…
The City never wanted a tabletop. The City wanted a "clothesline" that would theoretically enhance the height peak at King and Bay, with the buildings getting shorter as they got closer to Spadina. Then the City allowed Festival Tower at the tiff.Bell Lightbox to be built taller than they envisioned in their plan in exchange for the public benefit there. Other developments challenged that, saying "if they got 157 metres, we want 157 metres" to which the OMB said "sure, you deserve the same height even if you don't provide similar benefits" and THAT's what set up the tabletop, not the City but the OMB.
42