Toronto 250 Dundas West | 189.75m | 58s | Dream | Arcadis

The building is filled with Mount Sinai departments. The hospital and others will continue growing and require off site medical space. Either way, this isn't be redeveloped anytime soon or Bell Trinity Square or the office North of 160 Front on Wellington.
Always appreciate your insight. However that stance assumes the properties are not sold.
 
The building is filled with Mount Sinai departments. The hospital and others will continue growing and require off site medical space. Either way, this isn't be redeveloped anytime soon or Bell Trinity Square or the office North of 160 Front on Wellington.

I imagine a temporal link to the new Mt. Sinai research tower.

 
  • Like
Reactions: AHK
My partner works at Sinai and has contacts at one of the clinics, who was recently informed the clinic will be moving to 700 University. Unknown if this is related to future development at this location or not.
 
No new docs here...........but I expect some.........sooner than later.....

Updated AIC link to the 'Under Review' Site Plan from yesteryear:


If I were a betting man, I’d guess conversion of most or all office GFA to resi, in exchange for somewhere between 0 and 2% affordable rental.

I like your odds.

UT's most successful gambler, who always ante's up when he's got a Royal Flush was, of course, on point.

****

New Docs are in........took them a bit longer than I thought.........

Wish it had taken them longer still...........sigh.

The office component is indeed gone, and the height is bumped to 57s. ...........lets get the details:

@Paclo ; @3Dementia

Renders:

1730292264336.png


1730292289674.png


From the Cover Letter:

1730292359181.png

1730292381674.png


Oh no! You read that right UT............another park........yes this is literally one block from absurdly tiny little 'park' next to Artistry...........sigh.

Key Stats. Compared:

1730292499147.png


Revised Site Plan:

1730292566724.png


Revised Ground Floor Plan:

1730292615757.png




Change Summary from the Planning Letter:

1730292653978.png

1730292674914.png


1730292702232.png


@HousingNowTO will wish to monitor the commitment to 'more' affordable housing here.


Elevator Ratio: 5 elevators to 719 residential units. Ugh. 1 elevator per 143 units

Up to date link:


Following up on my Parks Comment, lets have a look at this area on google maps:

Screenshot 2024-10-30 at 08-57-33 Google Maps.png


The Purple is this site, with the green being the 'park' at Artistry and the two yellow are next to existing parks.

The area is short of usable parkland, but it is not short of useless parks.

There is room to expand Orde Street Park to the north and make it a much better, more functional space; and hey, Green P is one of the land owners/managers.

Meanwhile.........what if we shifted a rebuilt University Settlement Recreation Centre to the east on to this brilliant use of space:

1730293775021.png


Then some of the existing building footprint could be added to the park, but so could the Grange Road ROW.....

But no.......lets add another 750m2 random blob of green on which you can fit no sports amenities, no cultural amenities, no significant nature........yes, we can create another pretty place to sit....but there's one one block west......
 
Last edited:
Just to pull this out for highlight purposes: 5 elevators for 719 suites, 1 elevator per 143.8 suites?!?!

Adding 1 elevator, removing 1 suite per floor would provide 6 elevators for 662, or 1 for every 110 suites. Still too high a ratio, but not brutal like currently.

42
 
Completely agree with @Northern Light on his thoughts here, this park space is completely useless and it should be off site. I'd rather them expand the footprint of this building to fit in another elevator so it's less of a cattle herd situation.

Also I had a good laugh out of this here:

1730374139845.png


I'll believe it when I see it.
 
...is there a reason why they don't keep the original retail massing at podium level? Seems quite heavily used currently....shame to ditch something that's proving to be vibrant.
 
While far from perfect. I think it's an improvement over the previous proposal. It's too bad the artistry park and this one aren't next to each other. St Patrick has a bit of green with mature trees and this park will provide a green entrance to the street. I think it could work in the end. This park has the possibility to provide amenities that are not included with the other 2 local mini-parks. Due to the location I think it will be well used for a mini-park (most of the others I notice are not used at all). The big loss I see is all that retail disappearing. I think we may be going from around 10 retail spaces to 3?
 

Back
Top