Toronto 160 Front West | 239.87m | 46s | Cadillac Fairview | AS + GG

You can walk there from Union Station now. :)
IMG_6141.jpeg

From the Pathmap app
 
That area is definitely ideal for a new PATH connection, to bring greater connectivity to that section of the PATH. My only suggestion for the new PATH tunnel would be from the Citi building to 160 Front, but that's without knowing the PATH very well and how feasible it would be to build that.
 
You can walk there from Union Station now. :)
View attachment 553446
From the Pathmap app
This does highlight a few obvious gaps in the system on the west side...
  • Simcoe Place and MTCC should be connected under Front. The amount of convention goers that use this foodcourt is a prime example of why.
  • TD Terrace should be connected to Citigroup Place (this would mean not having to go under the subway to get to Union)
  • The Fairmont should open its already roughed-in PATH connection on its west side (at least for when that connection finally goes north as it is eventually planned to).
 
This does highlight a few obvious gaps in the system on the west side...
  • Simcoe Place and MTCC should be connected under Front. The amount of convention goers that use this foodcourt is a prime example of why.
That would make sense, yes, but would require Oxford and Cad Fairview agreeing that it is desirable and worth the spend.
  • TD Terrace should be connected to Citigroup Place (this would mean not having to go under the subway to get to Union)
Citygroup is a 'soft site'. More likely connection is to the future 20 York, but who knows if / when that could / would happen.
  • The Fairmont should open its already roughed-in PATH connection on its west side (at least for when that connection finally goes north as it is eventually planned to).
That's entirely up to KingSett.
 
There's a subway line right under that, which probably complicates things.
I should've clarified my post. I meant for a connection west to convention centre, then to cross Front to this new tower. Although I see the reasons above for why this connection hasn't been pursued yet.
 
The TD signage is waaaay too large.

The building would look so much better without it, regardless of the fact that its oversized.
 
The TD signage is waaaay too large.

The building would look so much better without it, regardless of the fact that its oversized.
I am going to surmise that the developer and architects here probably agree with that point. But they also needed to bring home the bacon where office demand was and is all going south...so they carved off some of their souls to give the anchor client reason not to look elsewhere with that stupidly large signage. /sigh
 

Back
Top