adma
Superstar
The building in the Portlands won't be built, in the proposed 4-layer form. I think you can count on that.
I'm not necessarily lamenting that per se. Ultimately, it's where Fordism and "bread not circuses" share common ground...
The building in the Portlands won't be built, in the proposed 4-layer form. I think you can count on that.
Only slightly tangential, I believe: Under the supposedly design and arts-friendly Miller administration, Toronto continued to have one of the lowest levels of municipal arts funding of any major city on this continent, so it will be interesting - in a "how low can we go?" sort of way - to see what happens next. However, I don't share the automatic mood of doom and gloom that says we're heading into a creative and cultural tailspin as a result of this election; given the unenthusiastic attitude of all levels of government ( the present Feds, for instance ) towards Toronto's art scene we're nevertheless living in an energized and creative community that seems resourceful and resilient. Government seed money may have got our recent cultural building boom going, but it was overwhelmingly financed by private and corporate donors - and by the public who've been bitten by the arts bug and who go to these venues. Sometimes ( Britain under Thatcher comes to mind ) adversity encourages a creative and critical stance.
I suspect you are right about Ford and the arts, but it should be remembered that this is a politician famous for making a big deal of what the rest of us would call "rounding errors."...Besides these issues are rounding errors in the fiscal considerations that will dominate his first term.
Thanks to our intractable transit development dilemmas, Toronto viewers are likely to experience a mixture of admiration and intense jealously upon witnessing the projects implemented by individuals like Enrique Peñalosa, former mayor of Bogotá, Colombia. Peñalosa was a key figure in the introduction of TransMilenio, a bus rapid transit (BRT) system that has served Colombia’s capital since 2000. Through the use of dedicated bus lanes, BRTs provide a frequency of service that rivals subway systems at a fraction of the cost, allowing for a considerably broader range of operation. That dedicated bus lanes reduce the amount of road available to motorists was never a concern for Peñalosa, who cites BRTs as an example of public good prevailing over private interests, and as a manifestation of democracy in action. If all citizens are equal before the law, he asserts, then “a bus with a 100 passengers has a right to 100 times more road space than a car with one.”
If it’s difficult to imagine our incumbent mayor sharing that sentiment, then Peñalosa’s efforts to establish a network of high-quality, protected bicycle paths sadly seem entirely at odds with City Hall’s apparent antipathy towards Toronto’s cyclists. Likewise the efforts of Copenhagen’s municipal authorities, who actively incentivize cycling via some of the world’s most robust cycling infrastructure. Noting that over one-third of Copenhagen’s work force commutes via bicycle, Danish architect Jan Gehl explains: “It keeps people fit, it doesn’t pollute, and it doesn’t take up much space. It’s a really smart way of getting around.” When Hustwit’s subjects express the advantages of cycling and the need to protect cyclists with such simplicity, the deplorable lack of adequate measures to safeguard Toronto’s cyclists is all the more galling.