Roy G Biv
Senior Member
I for one would find that more acceptable. At least Lebanese Canadians had more Lebanese flags than Hezbollah ones at their protests.
That's not my point. Sri Lanka is committing and has committed horrific acts against Tamils, just as the LTTE has committed horrific acts against Indians and the Singhalese. Is Sri Lanka "purposely targeting civilians"? Maybe not, but showing such minimal discretion is essentially analogous.
It's a morally ambiguous situation, more-so than Israel/Palestine.
It's arguable that a Sri Lankan flag should be as offensive as an LTTE flag. And who cares about "terror lists".
Last edited: