News   Jul 26, 2024
 1.4K     1 
News   Jul 26, 2024
 1K     0 
News   Jul 26, 2024
 2.9K     2 

Stem Cell Discovery at Mount Sinai

barrytron3030

Active Member
Member Bio
Joined
Dec 17, 2008
Messages
901
Reaction score
3
this is terrific for Toronto and the entire world. be proud UTF members! i can't wait until all of the new research centres and hospital additions are complete in this city. it will certainly help solidify toronto as a health giant and bring massive investment and innovation to the city.
__________________________

Toronto wins stem cell coup
Mount Sinai first to find safer way to reprogram adult cells, without the cancer risk, raising new hopes for organ repair

March 1, 2009
Comments on this story (4)

MEGAN OGILVIE AND JOSEPH HALL
HEALTH REPORTERS

Toronto scientists have scored a major coup in stem cell research, coming first in a world-wide race to find a safer way to make human skin cells act like embryonic stem cells. The discovery could well bring the promise of personalized organ repair within reach of patients.

Andras Nagy, and his team of scientists at Mount Sinai Hospital, are the first to re-program adult human cells into embryonic-like stem cells without using potentially dangerous viruses that could cause cancer.

The finding overcomes one of the major hurdles in using the re-programming technique in the search for new drugs, finding innovative cures for disease and creating personalized organs and tissue for patients.

Experts say the elegant discovery will quickly be adopted by labs around the world and will accelerate further advances in biology’s hottest field.

“This is a significant contribution,†says Alan Trounson, president of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, the state’s stem cell funding body. “It’s a very innovative way of delivering the gene products that are needed for reprogramming adult cells into embryonic stem cell-like cells. Well done to the Nagy group.â€

Scientists have been racing to find a more efficient and safer way to convert adult human cells into embryonic-like cells, called induced pluripotent stem cells, ever since the re-programming technique was first reported in November 2007.

Nagy’s coup is an indication that Ontario, particularly the researchers along Toronto’s University Ave., remains at the forefront of stem cell research.

Embryonic stem cells are known as the body’s master cells and can turn into any type of tissue or blood cell. Scientists want to harness that power for regenerative medicine, but groups opposed to the research say human embryos should not be destroyed to advance scientific study. Both scientists and opponents see re-programmed cells as a way to get around that controversy.

Nagy and his team started to investigate the new re-programming method in March last year. By April, he was collaborating with a British group, led by Keisuke Kaji at the University of Edinburgh, that was also on the same track. Their findings were reported today in a pair of complimentary papers in the prestigious journal Nature.

Scientists are keen to use induced pluripotent stem cells, or iPS cells, in their research because the re-programming method does not use human embryos or controversial cloning techniques — the two biggest ethical concerns dogging the field. The advent of the re-programming method also means that, for the first time, scientists have a near endless supply of embryonic-like stem cells for their research. And, perhaps most importantly, iPS cells will allow scientists to generate embryonic-like stem cells from individual patients, a key component in personalized medicine.

McMaster University scientist Mickie Bhatia says that reprogrammed stem cells are so promising, not only for their potential to generate new organs, but also because they bypass the rejection dangers that the use of tissues from other people always pose.

“The fact you can take someone’s own cells and generate stem cells that can be transplanted back into them is wonderful,†says Bhatia, the scientific director of the McMaster Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute.

Up until now, scientists have used viruses to re-program cells. The virus acts as a vector to get extra copies of four genes, or growth factors, into a cell, which then genetically re-program it back into an embryonic-like state. But the virus disrupts the cell’s DNA and may trigger cancer.

Nagy, in collaboration with the British group, found a way around using viruses to re-program cells. The teams identified a DNA sequence, called piggyBac, that can deliver the growth factors to a cell’s chromosome and then, after the re-programming, be removed with the growth factors all in one piece.

This double sequence of non-virus delivery and complete removal of growth factors is what makes the finding so important for future research on patients. Nagy likens the process to a space shuttle ditching its rocket once the fuel has burned up and the shuttle has reached space.

“The rocket has to be removed from the shuttle, otherwise it could create a problem,†says Nagy, who is a Senior Investigator at the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, investigator at the McEwen Centre for Regenerative Medicine, and Canada Research Chair in Stem Cells and Regeneration.

“It is the same with the reprogramming factors. They are potent, powerful factors so they can make stem cells. But they are needed for only three or four weeks ..... If they remain, they could create a risk.â€

Other scientists have demonstrated a non-viral way to reprogram cells, but none have been efficient in human cells. And though much of Nagy’s work was done using mouse cells, his team did show their virus-free method is an efficient way to generate human iPS cells. For Nagy, who will continue his work on human embryonic stem cells, the next step is to refine the reprogramming technique and make it even more efficient.

Michael Rudnicki, scientific director of Canada’s Stem Cell Network, called the study “a very important contribution†and says the new method will make iPS cells easier to generate and help scientists better understand the process adult cells must go through during re-programming. And, he says, it also appears to eliminate the dangers associated with using viruses to transport re-programming machinery into adult cell DNA.

“By making use of this ..... technology, all of the introduced genes can be removed in their entirety, leaving behind no modifications, says Rudnicki, a Canadian Institutes of Health Research scientist, and whose group helped fund the research.

“It’s an elegant advance in the technology. Conceivably the use of this technology will generate iPS cells that could go into patients because they would have no genetic modifications whatsoever.â€

The Ontario iPS Cell Facility, based in Toronto, is working with Nagy to refine the new reprogramming method, says Bill Stanford, the facility’s co-director. Researchers at the facility have generated 10 disease-specific cell lines, including one for cystic fibrosis using the original iPS technology.

“Once we have adapted the new technology,†says Stanford, “we will be able to increase our efficiency and increase speed of generation with new disease lines.â€

McMaster’s Bhatia says Nagy’s work helps cement Ontario’s position as the world leader in stem cell research.

“If you look at the planet in terms of who is doing what in terms of stem cells, there’s a heavy concentration in Canada certainly, but a very heavy concentration in Ontario,†says Bhatia, whose group has done groundbreaking work on coaxing embryonic stem cells to grow into new tissues.


thestar.com
 
Great news!

Hopefully this will put the whole controversy over embryonic stem cells behind us so we can move on to help people.
 
who would have thought that in a country with no restrictions on hESC research a discovery like this would be made. the knowledge gained from this will be very useful.

also, the controversy really isn't that much of a problem in canada.
 
I remember attending a lecture by Dr. Nagy many years ago. He seemed like a smart cookie. But his plan was to leave Canada and return to Europe. Glad to hear he stuck around and contributed to this breakthrough.
 
McMaster University scientist Mickie Bhatia says that reprogrammed stem cells are so promising, not only for their potential to generate new organs, but also because they bypass the rejection dangers that the use of tissues from other people always pose.

“The fact you can take someone’s own cells and generate stem cells that can be transplanted back into them is wonderful,†says Bhatia, the scientific director of the McMaster Stem Cell and Cancer Research Institute.

That's where I work at.
 
who would have thought that in a country with no restrictions on hESC research a discovery like this would be made. the knowledge gained from this will be very useful.

also, the controversy really isn't that much of a problem in canada.
There are certainly restrictions on hESC research in Canada, just not as strict as US but still stricter than UK and much of Europe. And there is still the non-legal aspect which, while much less polarizing and public than in the US, definitely still exists in Canada. There is also a lot of scientific interest in pursuing iPS, because of all the things it can reveal about epigenetic reprogramming in general, so Canadian scientists would be just as keen in chasing this story as scientists elsewhere. The facts that iPS was first pioneered in Japan, one of the least restrictive countries on ESC research, and that most of the major breakthroughs in stem cell research still came from the US indicate that, ultimately, the policies had very little direct correlation with research progress or directions in the respective countries (which is what a good number of US scientists are saying, to some extent facilitated by the abundance of private research funding in the US).

With regards to this story, it certainly makes me proud to have been taught by Dr. Nagy and having such a fine institution as my alma mater. Toronto is certainly "rising" in the biomed arena (Nature 453:252-253), but as many have pointed out, one problem that might still be keeping Toronto from becoming another Boston or San Francisco is the relatively less successful academia-industry transition. Not saying that industry is the be-all-and-end-all, but it has certainly played a huge role in establishing / cementing the positions of Boston and SF. And Toronto is definitely catching up in that respect.
 
what kind of restrictions were/are there?

p.s, do you work/study in the field?
 
what kind of restrictions were/are there?

p.s, do you work/study in the field?
not hESC specifically, but yes I do do stem cell-related work.

Canadian funding doesn't allow the use of hESC lines derived from embryos that are not leftovers from IVF clinics, whereas places like the UK and Japan do allow it, and they also allow things like SCNT with human cells ("cloning") and limited use of human-animal chimaeras. US currently still prohibits use of federal funding for any newly derived lines (Obama has yet to overturn Bush's prohibition), but several states including CA and MA have passed legislations and/or funding to supersede that.
 
first of all, thank you for working in the field you do. :)

second, are embryos that are not leftovers from IVF clinics really needed? i know that in the US, there are literally thousands that get junked (leftovers) every year. do we have that same sort of supply here or is there a greater demand that can't be met simply by leftovers?

also, what do you think about zygotes and their totipotency? IIRC, embryos are pluripotent. wouldn't zygotes be more useful? **edit** is the only difference between a totipotent zygote vs. a pluripotent embryo the ability to produce placenta with the zygote?

also, comparing pluripotent hESCs vs. iPSCs, do they have the same exact same attributes, meaning they can both produce the same cells the other kind can, plus cells divide and survive the same way? or are there differences?



not hESC specifically, but yes I do do stem cell-related work.

Canadian funding doesn't allow the use of hESC lines derived from embryos that are not leftovers from IVF clinics, whereas places like the UK and Japan do allow it, and they also allow things like SCNT with human cells ("cloning") and limited use of human-animal chimaeras. US currently still prohibits use of federal funding for any newly derived lines (Obama has yet to overturn Bush's prohibition), but several states including CA and MA have passed legislations and/or funding to supersede that.
 
first of all, thank you for working in the field you do. :)
thanks :)

second, are embryos that are not leftovers from IVF clinics really needed? i know that in the US, there are literally thousands that get junked (leftovers) every year. do we have that same sort of supply here or is there a greater demand that can't be met simply by leftovers?
Someone actually in the hESC derivation field might be in a better position to answer this. From what I know, not that many of the IVF embryos are actually legally eligible for use (due to consent and conflict-of-interest issues), and getting donations is actually a very throny issue. Getting actual leftovers (those that are of low quality and need to be discarded) might be less problematic, but as they are of low quality, the lines produced are not as reliable (it was only a year ago that low quality discarded IVF embryos were shown to be able to produce "good" lines). So I think if hESC were still to be pursued, some sort of provision needs to be made for novel creation of embryos.

also, what do you think about zygotes and their totipotency? IIRC, embryos are pluripotent. wouldn't zygotes be more useful? **edit** is the only difference between a totipotent zygote vs. a pluripotent embryo the ability to produce placenta with the zygote?
Zygotes or the early stage (<4-8-cell stage) blastomeres are relatively hard to culture, so derivation of lines from those hadn't had much success until a year or two ago. But ultimately, what we need are ES cells, those derived from the embryonic proper that will differentiate into all the cell types of the future organism (the three germ layers and the germ cells). Zygotes or early-stage blastomeres are indeed more potent (totipotent) than the pluripotent ES cells, because they can also give rise to the extraembryonic tissues such as the placenta. However, the most "useful" cells are still those that will give rise to the embryo proper, so really that's what most people would want and is what we'll end up using anyway even if we started from the zygote.

also, comparing pluripotent hESCs vs. iPSCs, do they have the same exact same attributes, meaning they can both produce the same cells the other kind can, plus cells divide and survive the same way? or are there differences?
That's where the prize is --- determining whether iPS are "equal" to ES. So far the answer seems to be yes, but much of the detail is still being worked out and that's what many people want to clarify before everybody jumps on the iPS bandwagon. The biology of ES themselves are still being worked out, so any useful comparison with iPS can only be made if research on ES continues.

But I am of the view that, ultimately, the most clinically feasible approach would not be through ES or even iPS, but the direct transdifferentiation of one cell type to another. Stem cells would still be a very important complementary approach, however (transdifferentiation may not be possible/easy for every cell type), and lots of important basic biology can only be learnt through studying stem cells.

Are you also a life sci student?
 
US currently still prohibits use of federal funding for any newly derived lines (Obama has yet to overturn Bush's prohibition), but several states including CA and MA have passed legislations and/or funding to supersede that.
As of noon of today, Bush's policy is officially reversed by Obama :cool:
 
Stroke victims take heart.
Peter's+McStroke.jpg
 
What about cord blood?

Will this breakthrough benefit people who have paid $ to store their babies cord blood? The fluid collected from a newborn's umbilical cord has lots of adult stem cells in it... My brother's wife talked him into spending fifteen hundred bucks to store their daughter's cord blood for 15 years. I just hope she was right to do it.
Of course let's pray they never need to use it...
 

Back
Top