gristle
Senior Member
And BTW Gristle you dodged so many of my questions it's not funny.. not to mention the fact that you contradicted your own logic.
Incorrect again Kamuix. You have contended throughout this thread that a conspiracy exists. You have asserted your belief in this conspiracy. However, you have failed at every request to provide any shred of actual proof in terms of evidence, timelines and players to support your assertion. You have finally admitted that you have no evidence whatsoever to support your claims. You simply believe in a conspiracy, but are incapable of understanding that this mere belief is utterly insufficient to "prove" your claim. It is merely an act of imagination no different from believing in ghosts or imaginary friends.
Did Gristle put you guys up to this? he dodged all my last questions & statements and hid behind a stupid one liner and comparing us to delusional people.
Yet more evidence of conspiratorial fears.
It's funny to me but makes me frustrated to how blind people can be.. It's shame how stupid you guys are going to feel when it becomes revealed that 911 was in fact a staged event.
What is funny is that you make a statement like this in total absence of any evidence to back up your claims. Your single-minded adherence to your unsupported belief comes off as delusional.
The facts are.. the 911 truth group is growing.. the false deceptions are being exposed faster then ever before and I take back what i said about 10 years from now.. can't see it being anymore then 2 before you guys are faced with the truth.
Attempting to hide your logical failings in some trumped-up belief of a majority point of view is merely an attempt to squeak your way out of the fact that you (and by extension, the entire supposed 911 "truth" movement) have no evidence to stand on. The age-old tactic of repeating your beliefs over and over is the only ploy you have left, and it is a worn-out tactic employed by all propagandists who wish to avoid addressing beliefs that are not supported by facts. You speak casually of "truth" but offer nothing to support a claim to such a concept. Your version of "truth" is quasi-religious in nature; it is belief that is not founded upon fact, but built upon a specific mindset that is tilted towards distrust and paranoia.
Might I remind you Kamuix, you make nothing more than hollow claims to truth because you admit to having no evidence of a conspiracy. The only conclusion that one can draw is that you do not understand the concept - even in the most general form, nor do you comprehend the idea that the claims you make require evidence in order to even be considered as a conspiracy. You appear to think that your beliefs and poorly-framed questions are all that is required to make such a claim. To say that this is incorrect is an understatement.