No. You're manipulating everything to try and make what I think about these events look ridiculous.. Give me a break!
Negative. I'm challenging you to produce verifiable evidence. No break for you on that.
I'm trying to get people to look outside the box and consider what i have to say and have shown.
Why should anyone pay attention to what you ask if you can't even provide evidence as a basis to do so? You just want unquestioning followers, and that's pathetic.
I'm not offering what i say as absolute proof.
Forget the word "absolute." You have no proof whatsoever. Try and start providing some verifiable evidence. I challenge you.
You won't offer proof for the side you're defending.
As noted on many occasions, I'm not defending a "side." You can go through the whole thread to see this - if you could actually be bothered. What I have told you repeatedly is that you have failed to properly discredit what you call the "official" record of events. More simply put, you have not bothered to refute that account, and you are clearly incapable of providing a plausible, factual, detailed chronicle of what you believe took place. As a result, you simply can't provide any supporting evidence because you have no fact-based account upon which to lend such evidence to.
You have nothing.
You don't address important things that I ask.
Where have you asked anything important?
You have an apparent weakness for confusing your state of mind as being some form of indication for the existence of conspiracy. Your fantasies are not facts.
You've made up your own rule that because I made a claim I must show absolute evidence.
That's funny. It's not my rule Kamuix. It's called the burden of proof, and the burden is on you to clarify and provide verifiable evidence to support your claims of a large-scale government conspiracy regarding the events of 9/11. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. All of this is just too much for you.
How the hell can you try and turn me not showing government controlled absolute proof into it being a tooth-fairy level of belief? That's BS why would you try to do that? It just shows that you have an agenda and shows exactly what it is
Your unsupported accusations are BS, Kamuix. Without any factual account or verifiable evidence, your conspiracy claim has the same weight as the tooth fairy story. Your disreputable belief in hidden agendas is merely more indication of your paranoid state of mind.
And yes it could be argued that because i didn't personally read official report that i perhaps should, I wouldn't necessarily call it narrow-minded, you're narrow minded.
Never mind "could." You have not read the official report. You admitted that you don't know what's in it, hence you can't even begin to start offering any reasonable refutation whatsoever. And you have the gall to call me narrow-minded? You're really grasping at straws.
But at least I can address and and admit it whereas you won't address Sh*t unless i show you evidence that cannot be provided and for no good reason.
So you address the fact that you haven't read the report you refuse to accept? That's simply stupid. And yes, if you make a claim regarding a massive criminal government collusion, I expect evidence. So would every court. There is nothing remotely unreasonable about challenging you to support your conspiracy claims with verifiable evidence. Too bad if that hurts your feelings or makes you feel deficient.
All you do is use an impossible question to justify being ignorant and avoiding all my questions, my other points, anything i discussed that was a bit off topic.
You've made a claim, now support it with evidence. If you find gathering that evidence impossible, then you have no evidence to support your claim, and that claim is invalid as there is not justification or proof of it. Your questions are not evidence, and they are certainly not interesting or even relevant. They are merely a weak attempt to evade the fact that you don't have evidence, don't know what verifiable evidence is, and that you would not have a clue about how to gather and present such evidence. Nine years on and you have zip. Pathetic.
Verifiable evidence, Kamuix. I challenge you. Either that, or admit that you have none - and no weasel words about it. Just state that you have no evidence at all to support your claim.
