I get your point i've even said over and over again that I get your point - You don't think i have evidence to support my claim - Fine.. I don't care I'm not here to provide the evidence you're looking for.
You're not here to provide any evidence, that much is clear. What you want is for people to believe what you say without question. It's not going to happen Kamuix. To show that such a conspiracy exists as you assert, the burden of proof is on you.
Why do you keep bringing things up we've already discussed?
Because you continue to fail at backing up your claims with evidence. The conversation isn't going in circles, it's coming to the dead end imposed by your continued incapacity to provide any verifiable corroborating facts.
Same thing here remember I'm trying to get people to consider it because it's more then highly possible and to do more research for themselves
Why should people be doing your work? Are you lazy as well as being bereft of any valid information? If you want to prove your 9/11 assertions, back them up with verifiable facts, data, timelines, participants and motives.
You address the same thing over and over and won't address anything else and we both know why. You have a one track mind and a very basic/easily conditioned mined as well, you're too far gone.
I address the issue repeatedly because you are incapable of providing supporting evidence. Why don't you simply admit that you have no evidence whatsoever to support your claims? Why don't you finally state here that you don't even have a rudimentary description of your conspiracy claim? Why don't you simply come clean and state that all of this paranoid conspiracy talk is simply a product of your own state of mind, and that you could never prove it from the start?
You have made claims that something conspiratorial took place, and I have asked you to provide substantiation. You have failed to do so over and over again. This illustrates quite clearly that the issue exists only within your head.
Here's the problem Grissie, all you've done is attack that I haven't shown you enough evidence to convince you that 9/11 is an inside job therefor you reject it completely.
No Katmix, I have asked you to support your assertions with evidence. That's not an attack. Your confusion stems from the fact that you feel profoundly threatened by the requirement of supporting you claims. It scares you that you have no evidence - hence the reason why you constantly try to divert attention with other pseudo-issues. That is why you characterize requests for proof as as "attack." It threatens your own mental illusions regarding the validity of your claims.
Not giving the idea a chance even though I've said that that's all I'm trying to do many times. Now you're become more aggressive in doing the same thing.
If I tell you that you should keep an open mind about an idea that a fairy visits the bedrooms of little children to exchange teeth for money, are you going to buy it just because I told you about it - and then insisted that you to keep an open mind? Are you that gullible? Imagining things is fun, but you need to offer proof Katmix, verifiable evidence. Imaginings, fantasies and baseless musings do not prove a conspiracy. You continue to fail at understanding this.
You've gone further to try and create the illusion that everything I've shown is complete nonsense...
You are the one dealing in illusions. You fail to offer evidence. You fail to see that your claims remain as illusions without verifiable proof.
Assuming you meant to say the flu shot.. Keep believing the establishment tells us and keep getting those shots and believing that our current controllers have good intentions and that there is nothing bad is those shots(like mercury).
Yes, I meant to say flu shot. Yes, I believe that those people producing those vaccinations have good intentions. Billions of flu shots and other inoculations have been administered around the world with no ill effects. Can you show otherwise? If you opt to, do so on another thread as this one is purportedly about 9/11.
Little lesson for Kamuix: everything in large enough quantities is toxic. Everything.
Another thing that's so funny is that if was just some crazy what they/you call Conspiracy theorists and I'm just out to spread hateful lies about our innocent Government(obviously from your prospective) then why would you waste all your time on me?
Yup, you try to spread ideas that lack any supporting evidence. If you want to have these fantasies on your own time, go right ahead. What goes on in your head is your own business. However, once you start making your fantasies public and try selling them as truth, then you should be prepared for when others start asking you to prove your case reasonably - something that you continue to fail to do here. That is my perspective (assuming that this is the word you intended). Regarding my time, I'll do with it what I please. Right now, that includes challenging you to either prove your conspiracy claims or to admit that it is merely an opinion of yours and that you have no proof to back your claims.
Yeah, you've brought these up before. They have all been answered and are not important or germane. What you have to do is provide the verifiable evidence necessary to support your conspiracy claims, or simply admit that you have none whatsoever and are merely voicing an unsupported opinion.
You're mind is just too narrow to get past simple deception.
You must prove the deception. You can't, so your claim is empty.
Don't you think it's a little weird that just because i don't show what you call "evidence" That suddenly I'm a crazy delirious person who's making up fairy tails built on nothing?
It's weird that you deny the relevance and importance of verifiable evidence in supporting conspiracy claims. The lack of adherence to providing reasonable support for such assertions puts you in the same category as witch-burners who always acted on belief and never provided proof to support their accusations or actions.
you're posts are weak because you keep doing the same thing over and over.
What exactly is "weak" about asking you to show evidence to support your conspiracy claims? You are exceedingly slow at picking up on the idea that if you want to change minds regarding your claims, you have to provide real evidence that is verifiable and supports your assertions. But first, you have to educate yourself on what that evidence is. Otherwise, I will continue to challenge you to either support your claims of a conspiracy with evidence, or suggest that you admit that you have no evidence and merely hold an unsupported personal opinion. Too bad if you don't like it.
