M
marksimpson7843
Guest
" I've been reluctant to add heights from planning reports"
Completely understand.
Completely understand.
|
|
|
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
M
marksimpson7843
Guest
Crane is up at Equinox 2
E
eddyouard
Guest
I was just there yesterday:
www.emporis.com/en/il/pc/...=2004&mt=2
I added all these pics to Equinox 1...
I assume the top-right pic is the crane at Equinox 2?
We can't classify a building as "under construction" until work begins on the foundation though.
Hard to tell from my shots if that has begun yet,
should have taken a closer look...
www.emporis.com/en/il/pc/...=2004&mt=2
I added all these pics to Equinox 1...
I assume the top-right pic is the crane at Equinox 2?
We can't classify a building as "under construction" until work begins on the foundation though.
Hard to tell from my shots if that has begun yet,
should have taken a closer look...
M
marksimpson7843
Guest
picky
E
eddyouard
Guest
Well, I don't make the rules...
But its not unheard-of for a crane to go up in a pit, only to come back down again when the money runs out, or whatever
But its not unheard-of for a crane to go up in a pit, only to come back down again when the money runs out, or whatever
M
marksimpson7843
Guest
If finances were the issue then the crane definitely wouldn't be erected. The crane represents the beginning of a new phase full of new contracts.
here's an example of bending the rules.
12 storeys or 35m eh?
here's an example of bending the rules.
12 storeys or 35m eh?
E
eddyouard
Guest
here's an example of bending the rules.
12 storeys or 35m eh?
two wrongs don't make a right
:no:
A
Archivistower
Guest
Interesting. I've never worked my way to the end of the NY list - that's a lot of buildings that ought not be listed as highrises. In Toronto we have only a few things that I would consider iffy or subject to intrepretation, and lots of 11 storeys that would likely be tall enough to qualify, if we had measurements.
M
marksimpson7843
Guest
sorry, Ed - just in one of those pestering moods.
M
Mr ManTO
Guest
here's an example of bending the rules.
12 storeys or 35m eh?
Interesting find.
E
eddyouard
Guest
E
EnviroTO
Guest
Re: equinox 2
I can see 11 storey buildings being 35m but the 8 storey buildings seem questionable. If these buildings really had 4.3m or 14ft per floor then wouldn't they be impressive as buildings and have pictures?
I can see 11 storey buildings being 35m but the 8 storey buildings seem questionable. If these buildings really had 4.3m or 14ft per floor then wouldn't they be impressive as buildings and have pictures?
E
eddyouard
Guest
8 = 35
here's one not too far away:
www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=176206
when taking into account structural additions to rooftops, and/or large ground floors, the other floors don't need to be nearly so high to reach 35m...
here's one not too far away:
www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=176206
when taking into account structural additions to rooftops, and/or large ground floors, the other floors don't need to be nearly so high to reach 35m...
M
Mr ManTO
Guest
Re: 8 = 35
Enviro, Under S.Com rules it must have an exact height along with an official source for that height if it's under 12-storeys.
Enviro, Under S.Com rules it must have an exact height along with an official source for that height if it's under 12-storeys.
M
marksimpson7843
Guest
Re: 8 = 35
Residence of Beauclaire in Vaughan has been finished for a while and is only 10 storeys
38 Hillcrest in Brampton won't be built
Residence of Beauclaire in Vaughan has been finished for a while and is only 10 storeys
38 Hillcrest in Brampton won't be built