People must remember that in the end, we must take the directive from our Sellers. Case in point: I listed a property last Saturday night. I gave the sellers two prices: $375,000 as market value using comparables, and a top listing price of $385,000. They chose $375,000. Three offers by the next afternoon, due to the extreme shortage of properties out there. Sold over the higher suggested list price in one afternoon - I didn't hold back on offers. If they'd chosen $385,000 as the list price, I think the multiple offer scenario would have been exactly the same and the eventual sale price exactly the same.. Just because properties are selling over asking doesn't mean they've been priced low. It's a reflection of the market conditions out there right now. Too many buyers, too few listings.
Mandating that any owner accept an offer that meets or exceeds the listing price is prevented by contract law. We, as agents, are not in charge of writing contract law. You cannot force anyone to sell something if they don't want to.
Try to imagine how we feel: we analyse the property to determine a proper price, we list the property at a fair market price, we spend hundreds and hundreds of dollars up front on floorplans, photography, marketing, websites, etc., we get the homeowner an offer AT asking (no other offers come in), and they refuse to sign it, stating they want MORE. It has happened quite often lately. They feel their house is the best on the block and they want over-asking like the house down the street. They refuse to sign the offer AT asking. Their property now has a stigma of 'greedy seller' and other agents avoid it (word travels quickly about sellers who refuse to sign a full priced offer). The listing agent never sees a commission cheque, after all that work in doing their job properly. Just remember the main point: the home seller gets 95% of the sale price, the agents get 5%. Who do you think is ultimately in charge of the pricing strategy?