picard102
Senior Member
I am getting seriously annoyed by all those politicians who consider the Charter and provincial human rights legislation as disposable.
The NWC is part of the charter.
I am getting seriously annoyed by all those politicians who consider the Charter and provincial human rights legislation as disposable.
The NWC is part of the charter.
Yes and back when the Charter was created, I thought it was extremely naive to imagine that politicians would always use it appropriately. But for that you need politicians of good will and they are in short supply.The NWC is part of the charter.
The current government believes you're either for them or against them - quite simple, really. Less than 20% of eligible voters can lead to unassailability.Yes and back when the Charter was created, I thought it was extremely naive to imagine that politicians would always use it appropriately. But for that you need politicians of good will and they are in short supply.
I'm not sure there was ever any practical consideration for how it was intended to be used. Those who supported it felt that it would protect democracy by preventing the unelected courts from overriding the elected legislators. Those who opposed it felt that it would weaken Charter-protected rights.Yes but it was never intended to be used this way. Doug Ford has bastardized it.
The entire point of a constitutional charter of rights is that it supercedes incompatible legislation, and it is the courts that are tasked with interpreting the constitution. Governments can avoid this by passing legislation that actually respects the constitution, imagine that. If we start thinking that legal decisions are questionable because judges are unelected, why limit ourselves to constitutional issues? We might as well light our very own American-style dumpster fire.I'm not sure there was ever any practical consideration for how it was intended to be used. Those who supported it felt that it would protect democracy by preventing the unelected courts from overriding the elected legislators. Those who opposed it felt that it would weaken Charter-protected rights.
It seems both sides were correct.
So make it mandatory for people to vote for options they don't feel any enthusiasm for?Time to make voting mandatory and not voting punishable by jail time.
Watch how quickly people vote to avoid a criminal record.
Lousy choices and low voter turnout
Time to make voting mandatory and not voting punishable by jail time.
Watch how quickly people vote to avoid a criminal record.
No more than Quebec and its constitution violating laws on language and religious garb.Yes but it was never intended to be used this way. Doug Ford has bastardized it.
I'm a bit baffled by the use of the NWC in this case. Is it really possible for the premier to completely ignore the law by invoking it?So what’s CUPE’s next step. They can‘t take a constitutional challenge. Can they sue the premier or government outside of the constitution? I sometimes think we need a provincial wide general strike, illegal if need be.
No, but it means one can’t use the constitution as the basis of one’s case against the government. I expect that’s what CUPE’s lawyers are working on now, how to legally fight without constitutional law.I'm a bit baffled by the use of the NWC in this case. Is it really possible for the premier to completely ignore the law by invoking it?
TDSB closing schools on Friday.