Divas S.
Active Member
The section in Brampton and Mississauga is perfect for commuting..?
In theory, but it doesn't connect any useful destinations, and is therefore not of much use. Additionally, the Hurontario LRT fills this role.The section in Brampton and Mississauga is perfect for commuting..?
With a curve added to the Kitchener line (and it looks like there's space for one already), it could connect to Line 6, Line 5, Line 2, Line 1, the Ontario Line, and the UPE.In theory, but it doesn't connect any useful destinations, and is therefore not of much use. Additionally, the Hurontario LRT fills this role.
It also connects to the Galt Sub (Milton Line) around Streetsville. If the missing link is built and CP Rail agrees to use it and allow more rail service through central Mississauga they can maybe use it for something then maybe they can run trains through to north Brampton and maybe southern Caledon (since it's supposed to grow greatly along the Brampton border) via the Galt sub.With a curve added to the Kitchener line (and it looks like there's space for one already), it could connect to Line 6, Line 5, Line 2, Line 1, the Ontario Line, and the UPE.
In theory, but it doesn't connect any useful destinations, and is therefore not of much use. Additionally, the Hurontario LRT fills this role.
Also, the town of Orangeville is entitled to a return on their lost money from this unsuccessful venture. The way they will accomplish this is by selling lands in Mississauga and Brampton with high value. This also makes the OBRY corridor valuable by providing space for high-density development.
Where along the OBRY do you see this happening? It seems more likely to me that low rise residential owners will acquire it for bigger backyards, much as the late lamented CNoR route northwest of Kennedy Station. Given it seems to pass by a couple of correctional institutions there may be resistance on their part to a public trail in that section.In theory, but it doesn't connect any useful destinations, and is therefore not of much use. Additionally, the Hurontario LRT fills this role.
Also, the town of Orangeville is entitled to a return on their lost money from this unsuccessful venture. The way they will accomplish this is by selling lands in Mississauga and Brampton with high value. This also makes the OBRY corridor valuable by providing space for high-density development.
It seems as if you are making the assumption that the only purpose of a rail line is for carrying passengers.If they don't have the commuter foundation, cost of the line is difficult to justify solely on the basis of general travel.
Provided that the collective town of Orangeville and city of Brampton can get their heads out of its own asses, the current usage was working well.Might you be able to suggest another use for the OBRY corridor?
It seems as if you are making the assumption that the only purpose of a rail line is for carrying passengers.
I would make the suggestion that they are capable of carrying so much more than just that.
It doesn't look like there's any room for this, if it is what you're thinking of.With a curve added to the Kitchener line (and it looks like there's space for one already), it could connect to Line 6, Line 5, Line 2, Line 1, the Ontario Line, and the UPE.
Looking through Urban Jon's history, it seems so ...Municipalities are not 'entitled' to a profit or cost-recovery.
For that matter, neither are businesses (though its certainly good practice).
You appear to have come on this forum for the sole purpose of disparaging several branch railway lines.............
Funny, we had a poster just like that awhile ago...........
Others have explained that it almost certainly won't be high-density. We all know that Brampton opposes an on-street LRT, whatever their reasoning may be. I usually see using rail corridors for LRT/BRT routes as a waste, but here, the route parallels Hurontario, and is quite straight. I'll repost this:In theory, but it doesn't connect any useful destinations, and is therefore not of much use. Additionally, the Hurontario LRT fills this role.
Also, the town of Orangeville is entitled to a return on their lost money from this unsuccessful venture. The way they will accomplish this is by selling lands in Mississauga and Brampton with high value. This also makes the OBRY corridor valuable by providing space for high-density development.
Seems incredibly short-sighted to close the line.With a curve added to the Kitchener line (and it looks like there's space for one already), it could connect to Line 6, Line 5, Line 2, Line 1, the Ontario Line, and the UPE.
It doesn't look like there's any room for this, if it is what you're thinking of.
View attachment 329363
It doesn't look like there's any room for this, if it is what you're thinking of.
View attachment 329363
.
That's the southeast corner. I was thinking of the northeast corner. With a couple of new stops in northern Brampton. I doubt there's demand north of that, for now.It doesn't look like there's any room for this, if it is what you're thinking of.
They own the property. It is the responsibility of the Town of Orangeville to provide for their citizens. Therefore, it would be improper for the town to make any deal on the right of way where they don't recover their full costs. This is why we shouldn't stand in the way of the sale and redevelopment of the right of way. It belongs to the town and they have the final say. It will provide a windfall for them at a time when it is much needed.Municipalities are not 'entitled' to a profit or cost-recovery.
Where along the OBRY do you see this happening? It seems more likely to me that low rise residential owners will acquire it for bigger backyards, much as the late lamented CNoR route northwest of Kennedy Station. Given it seems to pass by a couple of correctional institutions there may be resistance on their part to a public trail in that section.
I don't know which towns you are referring to. Barrie's railway is also on the ropes and will likely close soon. The Guelph Junction Railway is over 100 years old and exists in an established, strong manufacturing city so it is very different.There’s no law that says a town has to maintain rail infrastructure as part of its industrial development strategy… but it’s informative that other Southern Ontario communities are doing just that. The OBRY was clearly marginal, but the Town’s official antipathy created a self-fulfilling prophecy… one can’t say the line was not earning its keep when the rail users were deliberately driven away. A different municipal strategy might have retained revenue and added new businesses rather than letting the line decline.
And this is why there isn't much worth in preserving the RoW. Freight is going away. We know that. So what else can it be used for in the future? The OBRY corridor just isn't all that useful for transporting goods and transit when factoring in other redundant infrastructure.I think the OBRY is a loss that could have been avoided, but I don’t think it had much potential as a GO line.