|
|
|
Perhaps because Eglinton is partially underground already? It does not make any sense whatsoever. Well ehlow... Eglinton West
Who says that? You really need to stop making things up den, people doubt the 8 years to open schedule the liberals are promising, but 4-5 years to construction is much more likely.
The National Post says he won't cancel Eglinton. Note that they didn't quote Hudak there. Where's the link to Hudak's actual words? And where's the indication about the timeline on Sheppard. My point is that these won't happen during this term. They've made some long-term commitments about subway, sure. But they've also made it clear that the first priority is the Relief Line. And that they won't be building subways until they balance the budget (and cut taxes).
You really think it will only be 4 years until construction? This will take a long time to plan, to build. That was a a guess on my part, not making things up.
Perhaps because Eglinton is partially underground already? It does not make any sense whatsoever. Well ehlow... Eglinton West
