Yes, you would think that before they sold any units, they would have recieved prior approval by the city for the height of the building at the minimum. You would also think that they would have a contingency plan ,other than project cancellation, should the city not approve the height of the building. Honestly, had I been made aware that the decision to construct or not lied solely on city approval of the height of the building, I would have either not bought into this development, or bought another pre-construction at the same time to spread my risk. Keep hope alive that Cresford does the right thing that has the purchasers best interest in mind.
Curious, if given a choice, from the ones I presented in my previous post, which would you guys choose? A, B or C? I think I would choose B, hoping they keep the layout and lower the height. I don't need 10 feet.