scarberiankhatru
Senior Member
"Consequences" is such a negative word...
I would cordially invite my fellow forumers to return to the topic at hand.
What are the potential consequences of this trend?
Given the very high correlation between self-identified ethnicity and actual genetic ancestry, it is thankfully sufficient and common practice to not need actual genetic information for such purposes; the situation is, as I said, slightly more complicated for highly admixed populations, but the correlation is still strong, so until the whole country (or world) becomes one big mixture with free multiway gene flow, there is no reason it would not work.Genes are not the rationale, and it makes no sense to begin using them to set groupings when the entire point of multiculturalism and counting visible minorities and asking people what ethnicity they self-identify with or what country they are from is all based on anything and everything but genes, particularly since there's absolutely no way to acquire genetic information from anonymous census respondents, even if you ask them and they're willing to answer.
"Consequences" is such a negative word...
I know a Canadian Chinese guy that speaks with a Jamaican accent, and I met a blonde Canadian Dutch woman with an Indian accent and a Chinese last name. I also know a half Polish Canadian guy with a Quebecois accent.Aside from skin colour and heritage everyone could all melt someone into a new race of Canadians, perhaps even with new regional accents, it's started to happen already.
Given the very high correlation between self-identified ethnicity and actual genetic ancestry, it is thankfully sufficient and common practice to not need actual genetic information for such purposes; the situation is, as I said, slightly more complicated for highly admixed populations, but the correlation is still strong, so until the whole country (or world) becomes one big mixture with free multiway gene flow, there is no reason it would not work.
Having good, scientifically consistent data on the country's ethnic make up can, for example, inform the authorities on how to allocate healthcare resources, what diseases/tests/treatments to focus on or expand upon, etc. Ethnicity and counting vismins has, you know, real "dick sucking" consequences (yea that didn't make sense, but I had to throw it in somewhere) other than how much ethnic food we're getting (or at least I hope the census takers realize that).
That's why I've never argued that all existing categories are adequate, and more can be done to improve the way ethnicities are reported, including continuing to refine the categories according to new data and understanding.It doesn't work when people report themselves as "Canadian." What if 50% do this in 2011? You need to prod further than "State your ethnicity/ethnicities."
Some people get quite offended if asked to answer anything other than Canadian.That's why I've never argued that all existing categories are adequate, and more can be done to improve the way ethnicities are reported, including continuing to refine the categories according to new data and understanding.
I love how white people who move to Oakville are considered "racist", but Asians who move to Markham or Indians who move to Brampton are just trying to fit in.I think a consequence of this is that racist people that I hate seem to move outside of the city because of it which then makes my life much better.
Some people get quite offended if asked to answer anything other than Canadian.
One of my university profs would answer "Canadian" whenever asked by anyone what her ethnic background was, even though she was an obviously Asian, teaching Japanese in university. Then again, I believe she was born and raised in Canada, so "Canadian" makes perfect sense.
Why is "Canadian" a less valid answer than Chinese, Arab, or Polynesian?
Would your answer to my question also apply to people who claim to be Mexican, Cuban, or "French-Canadian"?
Some people (myself included) do not like to answer ethnic questions because our culture perceives "White" ethnicities differently than "non-White" ones.
Dunno about Klingon, but apparently 55000 Jedis in the 2006 census.I'd be interested in how many people identify themselves as "Klingon". Seriously.