Hong Kong's transit lines likely make profits - our transit lines are more like public services.
In the case I mentioned above, the
KCR that operated West Rail was a government-owned corporation (the privatized MTR only took over operations of the line in December of that year). KCR was profitable, but not likely because of West Rail - it was considered a "white elephant" (similar to our Sheppard Subway) because it failed to meet its projected ridership.
Just to extend the analogy, would people expect tax refunds from the province if an accident blocked the 401 or scheduled construction turned their 40 minute commute into 2 hours due to lane restrictions?
Not the 401, but if an incident of an equivalent magnitude stranded drivers on a toll route like the 407, I think it would not be unreasonable for them to ask for a refund/discount on their tolls.
*****
Giambrone has not ruled out compensation for passengers affected by the incident, just that it won't be a refund (
http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/article/728525--forget-about-a-refund-says-ttc-chair?bn=1). Peter Kuitenbrouwer at Posted Toronto suggested that the TTC give out free tokens - I think that is a dumb idea; the TTC's made thousands of people line up on Yonge Street to board shuttle buses, and now you want people to line up again for tokens?
The only alternative appears to be free rides on the YUS one Wednesday evening, plus a discount on the December Metropass. I'm not calling for an outrageous discount on the Metropass; a reduction of the price by the value of one cash fare or one token should be fine. Considering December is holiday season and fewer people would be buying Metropasses anyway, the effect on the TTC would not be as great as other months of the year.
With this incident, the upcoming fare increase, and angry commuters ready to revolt, the TTC (and Adam Giambrone) needs to do something to improve its public image. For the long term, this appears to be the thing that will keep TTC accountable to its customers.