grey
Senior Member
Plus it looks like that wall is right up to the property line, so windows wouldn't make any sense there as someone could build a tower on the adjacent lot a few centimeters away.
|
|
|
current
Active Member
August 11
From Peter and Adelaide.
Front of the building
Back/West side of the building.
From Peter and Adelaide.
Front of the building
Back/West side of the building.
urbandreamer
recession proof
22 August 2008 photo update
Almost redbricked over, from King St W:
Almost redbricked over, from King St W:
current
Active Member
September 23
From Adelaide.
From Peter St.
From Adelaide.
From Peter St.
urbandreamer
recession proof
A nice minimal but attractive building, eh? Thx for the photos, I have been slacking in that department....
4grand
Active Member
The red brick looks very different to that of the building next door. IS this prefab, made-to-look-like-brick?
MisterF
Senior Member
The Building Code is a provincial document. The city has nothing to do with it and has no power to overrule it.
You can have windows on a wall that's as close as 2 feet from the property line, and right on a property line that abuts a street.
egotrippin
Senior Member
While I haven't seen it in person, I'm pretty certain it's just precast "brick look" slabs. It's actually too bad, with some nice real bricks this building wouldn't be so bad.
current
Active Member
December 7
gei
Active Member
nothing spectacular... but it fits into the area quite nicely
maestro
Senior Member
it's new brick unlike the building next door
taal
Senior Member
shoot me but I like it!
Obviously it would be nice for a more extravagant building but if that isn't possible I'd take this.
In person it looks very similar to those photos as well.
Obviously it would be nice for a more extravagant building but if that isn't possible I'd take this.
In person it looks very similar to those photos as well.
So you're saying the photos are photorealistic?
42
42
taal
Senior Member
Automation Gallery
Superstar
Come on guys this thing is butt ugly.