ARG1
Senior Member
... why are they raising the tracks by 5"?Let me bring that forward for everyone:
View attachment 597081
View attachment 597082
View attachment 597083
... why are they raising the tracks by 5"?Let me bring that forward for everyone:
View attachment 597081
View attachment 597082
View attachment 597083
... why are they raising the tracks by 5"?
Maybe they mean this portion for geometry/grading reasons?
The Work includes but is not limited to station building upgrades, platform rehabilitation including introducing precast curbs, tactile plates, a snow melt system and the replacement of two (2) platform shelter, site works including parking lot and bus loop rehabilitation as well as the replacement and introduction of four (4) new bus shelters.
Sure looks like they're getting to work at West Harbour.
View attachment 597358
CN logo on the equipment. I'm assuming, because this stretch of track is owned by CN, that CN is responsible for construction of this project? Or is MX merely leasing out their equipment?Sure looks like they're getting to work at West Harbour.
View attachment 597358
CN logo on the equipment. I'm assuming, because this stretch of track is owned by CN, that CN is responsible for construction of this project? Or is MX merely leasing out their equipment?
What does CN stand to gain from working on passenger rail projects? Why would they dedicate their own time, man power to working on this project? Is MX paying them? Is this a gesture of good will? Asking out of curiosity.CN will be performing the work.
- Paul
What does CN stand to gain from working on passenger rail projects? Why would they dedicate their own time, man power to working on this project? Is MX paying them? Is this a gesture of good will? Asking out of curiosity.
That's exactly how it works. Metrolinx tells CN to do something, they come to an agreement, and then CN sends them the bill. The interesting question (if anything) is whether CN just charges them the flat cost of labour and resources (so 0 profit - covering the costs), or if there is some sort of upcharge, and if so how much?What does CN stand to gain from working on passenger rail projects? Why would they dedicate their own time, man power to working on this project? Is MX paying them? Is this a gesture of good will? Asking out of curiosity.
That's exactly how it works. Metrolinx tells CN to do something, they come to an agreement, and then CN sends them the bill. The interesting question (if anything) is whether CN just charges them the flat cost of labour and resources (so 0 profit - covering the costs), or if there is some sort of upcharge, and if so how much?
Haha! Bill Gates wouldn't invest in a for-profit company that does work at cost!While I can't speak to the specifics on this work...........I think its more than fair to say there's an mark-up, LOL