Allandale25
Senior Member
^ Great update. I posted a cool picture of the Davenport Overpass construction in that thread if folks are interested
Theres that "T" logo again. is this actually going to be a thing?
Already isTheres that "T" logo again. is this actually going to be a thing?
- Kennedy, Agincourt, and Milliken stations all coming along well.
Theres that "T" logo again. is this actually going to be a thing?
A stupid thing.Already is
It's been reported here and I tend to agree that EllisDon is stretched super thin and so the crews working the Stouffville stations are chronically understaffed and so things are definitely crawling along. Agincourt was advertised to be finished by the end of 2021. If by finished they meant only the station building and not the platforms and connecting tunnel then ok... but it's still a construction site. For Milliken it seems that most of the effort is going into the underpass (got to keep those drivers happy!) because compared to Agincourt, Kennedy and Unionville the platforms are way behind.I beg to differ... That Milliken station construction has been going on forever (even before the pandemic) and can be hazardous to your health. I just twisted my ankle yesterday there because of all the construction going on. To get to and out of the boarding zone, you have to negotiate a maze. There was actually not much progress done in the past year. To make matters worse, GO is running the short trains even during rush hours and the seating is still limited to two people per pod of four. As a result the train I took was packed... the one that gets to Union at around 8:30AM.
It's been reported here and I tend to agree that EllisDon is stretched super thin and so the crews working the Stouffville stations are chronically understaffed and so things are definitely crawling along. Agincourt was advertised to be finished by the end of 2021. If by finished they meant only the station building and not the platforms and connecting tunnel then ok... but it's still a construction site. For Milliken it seems that most of the effort is going into the underpass (got to keep those drivers happy!) because compared to Agincourt, Kennedy and Unionville the platforms are way behind.
Renderings of the new Long Branch GO Station from IO.
I don’t understand ML’s approach to this project, in that the double tracking had no value without doing the new platforms and tunnels, yet the work was let such that the platforms and tunnels were an afterthought. And yes they have progressed slower than anyone would like.
One also wonders why they had to build “complete“ new stations when the older buildings were not that bad, and the intent is for a high frequency line where no one needs to remain on the platform for very long anyways.
However, having not travelled on this line since last fall, I was impressed at how much has changed since my last visit - in particular, the tunnelling and concrete pouring at stations is largely finished, platform steel has been mostly erected, and now the work is at the point of fitting out the platforms and applying cladding. It’s messy, yes, but one can see the end approaching.
Not finishing that bridge over the creek is inexplicable given the time since the contract was let.
- Paul
I couldnt agree more with everything you said, but unfortunately it's clear that Metrolinx doesnt see Long Branch as a critical station from a ridership point of view. Which means they probably would never see the benefit (from a cost-benefit point of view) of doing something like that.I would be much happier with an “umbrella“ style canopy over each platform that doesn’t divide the width of the platform into a walkway and a shelter. Long Branch has extremely narrow platforms and having those narrow walkways next to full speed passing trains is a recipe for fatalities. Putting roofing on the platforms may be a good idea, but as headways are being reduced, the need for full all-weather indoor sheltering goes away.
Long Branch is in a tight spot and widening the platforms would not be cheap, but even three feet of added width would greatly improve safety and the ambience of the station.
- Paul
Long Branch should be a critical station, given its proximity to Hwy 427.it's clear that Metrolinx doesnt see Long Branch as a critical station from a ridership point of view
I couldnt agree more with everything you said, but unfortunately it's clear that Metrolinx doesnt see Long Branch as a critical station from a ridership point of view. Which means they probably would never see the benefit (from a cost-benefit point of view) of doing something like that.