News   Jul 17, 2024
 346     0 
News   Jul 17, 2024
 762     0 
News   Jul 16, 2024
 1K     2 

Globe Column: The left, divided, opens the door for the Conservatives

unimaginative2

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
4,554
Reaction score
10
Location
New York
The left, divided, opens the door for the Conservatives
LAWRENCE MARTIN

From Monday's Globe and Mail

E-mail Lawrence Martin | Read Bio | Latest Columns
September 17, 2007 at 4:30 AM EDT

Tom Flanagan has a message New Democrats won't want to hear. In a candid new book called Harper's Team, the top Conservative strategist reveals that Jack Layton and company were the key to bringing Stephen Harper - not exactly a Dipper kind of guy - to power.

The Layton decision to attack Paul Martin's Liberals and lay off the Tories in the 2006 campaign was what paved the way, concludes the Calgary academic, a Harper confidant. "No matter how well designed our campaign had been, it would have been hard for us to win if the NDP had not held up its end."

In the previous election in 2004, the Grits won because New Democrats ran to them in the closing days out of fear of a Harper triumph. In 2006, Mr. Flanagan explains, the Layton strategy prevented any such desertion. The NDP increased its seat haul from 19 to 29.

In several prior elections, it was a split on the right between Tories and the Reform factions that helped make Liberal wins possible.

This time, as poetic justice would have it, the splits haunted the left.

And keeping the left divided, writes the Flanner, will be critical to future Conservative wins. Canada, he concedes, is simply not a natural home for the right. "Neither the philosophy of conservatism nor the party brand comes close to commanding majority support." Therefore, he adds, the Conservatives "will win if the other four parties are at each other's throats; they lose if they line up together, particularly if NDP and Green voters swing to the Liberals."

His book, just out, will provide much food for thought for the portsiders. It speaks, for example, to the wisdom of one of the moves Stéphane Dion has made since becoming Liberal leader - his entente cordiale with the Green Party.

Mr. Dion made a pact with Green Leader Elizabeth May not to run a Liberal candidate against her in the Nova Scotia riding where she is seeking a seat. He was slagged by some in his own party, and many in the media, for the unusual manoeuvre. But the gambit helps make his Liberals the second choice of Green voters, of which there are increasing numbers. Says pollster Nic Nanos: "Political entente with Ms. May will likely pay dividends for the Grits come election time."

The Green Leader and Mr. Dion have not expanded their pact. "But there is a lot of mutual respect and goodwill there," Ms. May said in an interview. Voters are not exactly overjoyed with the Harper minority, she added. "Maybe they'll decide to give Stéphane Dion a minority."

The NDP has eased off its attacks on the Grits since Paul Martin stepped down. In the leadership campaign, Mr. Layton said the Liberals would never elect a man of Mr. Dion's integrity. But that's not the reason the party is laying off, said a Layton spokesman. Given his anemic performance, he said, the targeting isn't necessary.

In Quebec, however, the two parties are at one another's throats. Today, three by-elections in the province are being contested. One sees the NDP and Grits in a high-stakes fight in the Liberal stronghold of Outremont. It represents a great opportunity for an NDP breakthrough in the province where it has long been shut out. Mr. Layton has been working hard in Quebec and has a big name candidate in Thomas Mulcair, a former environment minister in Jean Charest's Liberal government. He was leading in last week's poll over the Liberal, Jocelyn Coulon.

The media have a tendency to read a lot, sometimes too much, into by-elections. This one is being seen as a big test of the Dion leadership. If his candidate loses, it will be interpreted as an ominous sign. In the Quebec ridings outside the island of Montreal, the Conservatives are quickly becoming the alternative to the separatists. If the NDP gets a foothold in Montreal, then the Grits, who used to own the province, could see their urban vote imperilled there as well.

And wouldn't that light up the faces of Tom Flanagan and Stephen Harper. The more the Dippers divvy up the left, the more the door swings open to the right.

lmartin@globeandmail.com
 
Layton increased his seat count considerably in the last election. His party gained significantly from those who were fed up with the Liberals. Layton isn't stupid, and I think he had, and still has, a pretty good idea what he was doing.

Harper isn't a stupid man either, and if he can leave the way clear for some NDP gains, it will benefit him. He has room to throw a few bones to the NDP and help to keep them viable, so that they can siphon off some Liberal support.
 
Of course Layton is smart and knew exactly what he was doing. The NDP still celebrates the 88 election, even though the majority government that was elected went against all their core beliefs. They want the Tories to crush the Liberals, in the hopes that eventually the NDP will emerge from the ashes as the stronger party and replace the Liberals as the left alternative.
 
back in the day (I'm talking about the Liberal heyday) it was my fond desire to see the PC party and the Alliance choke themselves into obscurity and the Bloc Quebecois self implode, with the NDP emerging as the official opposition. I know, it's a pipe dream to wish for a centralist party as government and a leftist party as opposition, but hey... one can dream, can't he?
 
naw the liberals are to entrenched in the Canadian Political mindset to ever go way... Bring Up Laurier, King (yes he talked to Ghosts), Pearson, and even Trudeau and liberals and even former liberals get a warm fuzzy feeling about their party... King and Trudeau are questionable but Laurier and Pearson are indisputable great.


the last indisputable great conservative PM was Borden in WW1 and the other great Conservative was our First PM Sir John A Macdonald (however he came to Question Period Drunk).



They are still somewhat strong today even with a weak leader and the greatest Canadian corruption scandal ever haunting them...


If the conservative faced the same challenges, they would be in the hinterland like in 1993. :D
 
They are still somewhat strong today even with a weak leader and the greatest Canadian corruption scandal ever haunting them...

Your selected passages were barely passable, up until this groaner. Just how would you define the greatest Canadian corruption scandal ever? In your opinion, what would be the second greatest corruption scandal - since you appear to be rating them.
 
Stupid article... There are no two mainstream parties that represent the left: NDP is the only one, so nothing is 'divided.'
 
well you guys must be radical lefties as i see the current party more left wing then during the Chretien years...

Just how would you define the greatest Canadian corruption scandal ever? In your opinion, what would be the second greatest corruption scandal - since you appear to be rating them.

Okay, i meant that was the thing that drove the liberals out of office...

Really Martin would have easily got a massive majority and would still be easily PM...
 
They are still somewhat strong today even with a weak leader and the greatest Canadian corruption scandal ever haunting them...

Groan.

Brush up on your history, please. Ever heard of the Pacific Scandal? Airbus? Charlie Tuna? Or Sam Hughes' scandalous purchases during World War I based on nepotism and self-interest over providing working weapons and usable equipment?

Some of the biggest scandals in Canada came out of Duplessis' Quebec.
 
Lordmandeep, in what possible way could you consider Mackenzie King to be dubious? Because he had an unusual personal life? That doesn't change the fact that he was probably our greatest Prime Minister.

There is a strong point to be made, though, that Sponsorship caused the most upset and got the most sustained coverage of any Canadian political scandal, with the arguable exception of the Pacific Scandal. It was the dominant issue for two general elections. While it may have been overblown, it was a pretty major scandal.
 
well you guys must be radical lefties as i see the current party more left wing then during the Chretien years...

A radical lefty would be a communist, something the NDP is light years away from, and the Liberal party in a completely different universe.

The Chretien era was an era of fiscal prudence over any other interest, so the fact that the current party leans a bit left of that doesn't suddenly make it left wing.

The political spectrum is obviously compressed to a very large degree but talking about the division between Liberals and the NDP is absurd, since that would compress the system even further. Maybe we can merge NDP, Liberals, and Conservatives together and that way we'll always have our ideal party win...
 
the political spectrum is something that is so specific that it can vary from person to person really.

I see Liberal as left-centre and Tories as centre-right.


Sure the sponsorship scandal wasn't the biggest or the worst scandal ever, but the media coverage it got was massive and almost everyone knew about it, even people who never cared about politics... It's effect were major as well. Martin really was very popular when he first came to power and really could have ruled Canada for a decade really That Scandal, made him quite unpopular and really Tarnished the liberal brand a lot. It will be a long time before the Liberal get anywhere as powerful as they were in 2000-2002.


About King, he was great on every level, but its quite strange he use to talk and consult with ghosts. If Harper did that, i would bet he would be out of office in a year... :D
 

Back
Top