M II A II R II K
Senior Member
The current Union Station platform could be used for the University-Don Mills line, and the Yonge Line can get a new Union Station in a straight line under King.
However, for those middle income working families, who make $70-80K year, one third would go to income tax, 13% goes to HST, how can the remaining money be sufficient to buy much for the daily necessities, not to mention $450k "median priced" homes?
The current Union Station platform could be used for the University-Don Mills line, and the Yonge Line can get a new Union Station in a straight line under King.
I agree. I don't get the obsession with connecting the Yonge and Spadina lines in the north. Just for the sake of having a "complete" circle? Who would travel from, say Sheppard/Don Mills to Sheppard/Dufferin? There is nothing at sheppard/dufferin as far as know...
Connectivity and redundancies in the system are important for overall efficiency and quality of the system. If there is a problem at York Mills, people can just take the spadina line North from downtown and cross over to Yonge again past the problem. This would surely ease a lot of the pain when running shuttle buses between sections of Yonge, etc during a breakdown or something. We know all too well that the system isn't 100% full-proof and that problems do occur. Connectivity allows the overall system to adapt better to them.
There's lots of lack of connectivity issues in London - sometimes with two tunnels crossing each other, with no stations.Ideally everything should be inter-connected like the London underground.
You realize that London Underground finally stopped operating their Circle line as a circle. It's still called the circle line, but it no longer operates an infinite circle, but now is simply a regular, end-to-end, line. More of a cork-screw now than a circle.Eventually, I'd like to see a "circle" line, like what London and Shanghai do, which connects every other lines in their huge intertwining "network". However, we won't have the luxury for a long time.
You realize that London Underground finally stopped operating their Circle line as a circle. It's still called the circle line, but it no longer operates an infinite circle, but now is simply a regular, end-to-end, line. More of a cork-screw now than a circle.
It did run in a real circle for a long time ... from the 1940s to the end of 2009. Though various trains would generally go out of service in various places - and it was frequently out-of-service, and late. The breaking of the circle was an attempt to improve reliability, which has as far as hear, worked very well.Yes, i do know that. Actually I thought it runs in circle when I was traveling, before I realized it doesn't! Something I didn't understand.
Connectivity and redundancies in the system are important for overall efficiency and quality of the system. If there is a problem at York Mills, people can just take the spadina line North from downtown and cross over to Yonge again past the problem. This would surely ease a lot of the pain when running shuttle buses between sections of Yonge, etc during a breakdown or something. We know all too well that the system isn't 100% full-proof and that problems do occur. Connectivity allows the overall system to adapt better to them.
I've liked the idea of detaching Yonge from University-Spadin and joining the DRL to University-Spadina line instead since I first heard it--especially after hearing the University line was the original "DRL"--to relieve Yonge.
I can't remember whose idea it was though. But it's been brought up many times now. I think the originator of the idea had a diagram too, but I could be wrong, it may have been someone else. It must have been years ago.