LUVIT!
Senior Member
I hardly notice the wires and poles. However the buildings look exactly like what they mostly are. Institutional. Boring blah and banal.
That building looks pretty nice to me, unless you mean the color or context to the rest of the area?It could be much worse. I was recently in Montreal and saw the new CHUM (University of Montreal Hospital Building) and it is hideous. To be fair, it's a much larger complex, but I was stunned they built something so awful. It looks even more hulking in person.
View attachment 219281
In Montreal they complain about "too much brown" so anything else is generally welcome.It could be much worse. I was recently in Montreal and saw the new CHUM (University of Montreal Hospital Building) and it is hideous. To be fair, it's a much larger complex, but I was stunned they built something so awful. It looks even more hulking in person.
View attachment 219281
1001 QUEEN ST W Ward 10 - Tor & E.York District | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Colour schemes aside, the quality of the materials of the Montreal buildings is far superior than CAMH.
In Montreal they complain about "too much brown" so anything else is generally welcome.
Also, views of buildings from angles from which you don't interact with them in real life aren't particularly useful. That's just a symptom of the internet (If I lived on a baloon or in the middle of the lake or 3000 ft in the air 30 kms away, etc., etc., this is what it would look like - who cares, you don't.)
I thought they looked very hospital-like and was impressed that they had covered over the expressway by Metro Champ de Mars
(from where I took these).
Although the addition of some jaunty wooden hydro poles would have added more 'vibrancy' and 'character'. Missed opportunity!
View attachment 221723View attachment 221724View attachment 221725