Actually, being open-minded, I've looked into this. The answer to your question is, apparently,
nothing. Presumably this would be because the City did not breach any contracts or covenants, since none had been entered into.
So you might want do a little reading before building straw man arguments, since you either neglegently or dishonestly fed this thread misinformation.
Your position has now been shown to rest on false premises: it cannot stand.
And I'm always humoured by the "don't criticize Ford until he really fucks up" lectures that invariably come from Ford supporters, especially when they accuse others of partisanship.
Good luck with your next posts, Woodbridge Heights. I sure hope they're better thought out than these were.