TheKingEast
Senior Member
Stopped reading after "Sotheby's"
Stopped reading after "Sotheby's"
Fitch warns on housing
Along with a new report today showing Canadian home prices still rising comes a warning from a credit rating agency that the government may have to intervene in the housing market yet again.
Fitch Ratings, which has believed for some time now that the residential real estate market is overvalued to the tune of about 20 per cent, warned that heavy consumer debt levels have “made the market more susceptible to market stresses like unemployment or interest rate increases.”
The credit rating agency doesn’t believe the jobless level is going to spike, but it doesn’t see interest rates easing further, either.
“Both property sales and building permits for residential construction have picked up in recent months,” Fitch said in today’s report.
“Home prices also continue to be supported by historically low interest rates and a lack of supply in the major metropolitan areas; these factors have propped up affordability and drive demand.”
Fitch noted the many steps Canadian policy makers have taken over the past few years to “mitigate some of the risks,” including those from the government, the banking regulator and Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp.
“However, the long-term impacts remain unclear, and policy makers may be required to take additional steps over the short term to engineer a soft landing.”
The Fitch report came just a new reading of Canada’s housing market showed prices continued to rise in June, though lagged for what’s generally expected in that month.
Prices rose 0.9 per cent from May, according to the Teranet-National Bank house price index released today, and climbed 4.4 per cent from a year earlier.
Last month’s increase was “substantial,” according to the statement, though was the second slowest for the month of June over the last decade.
Compared to last June, the rise of 4.4 per cent was the slowest in six months.
Calgary again led the country, with a jump of 8.1 per cent from a year earlier, while Toronto and Vancouver each recorded gains of 6.1 per cent.
National Bank economist Marc Pinsonneault expects prices to continue rising, though with “weakness east of Toronto being dwarfed by generally healthy market conditions elsewhere.”
Over the course of the year, prices indeed fell in Halifax, Quebec City and the Ottawa area.
Canadian economists generally believe the market is heading toward the hoped-for soft landing.
“With the housing market having now shaken off the winter blues, prices are continuing to rise at a solid pace,” said senior economist Randall Bartlett of Toronto-Dominion Bank.
“That said, the continued deceleration in price growth on a year-over-year basis may be an indication that the Canadian housing market is becoming more balanced,” he said in a research note today.
“We expect to see the cooling trend continue through the end of 2015. This view is premised on rising prices encouraging strong growth in new listings while the number of newly-competed housing units remain elevated, both of which will boost supply and weigh on prices. At the same time, interest rates are likely to grind higher in Canada, resulting in reduced affordability.”
The "when" is the million dollar question. As with all markets, real estate goes up and it goes down. It rallies and then it corrects. Trying to predict when it corrects is as impossible as predicting exactly when it's going to boom.
The challenge is: how long do you wait and at what correction do you jump into the market? When you do, how many others will be there, also having waited, and now ready to bid on those undervalued properties?
How much appreciation will have gone by before the correction? When the correction happens, will it be enough to offset the wait? Assume the market increases year over year at a rate of 5%. You'd need a 22% correction to make that 5 year wait cost-neutral (in the simplest of terms, of course, as we're not including carrying costs, opportunity cost, inflation, etc.). This means a house currently worth $700,000 would need to drop to $546,000 for that 5-year hold to make sense.
I'm not a real estate pumper nor am I a real estate bear. I just try to approach it in a rational and practical manner.
I think your assumption that you're losing out on returns by not investing now is misguided. You can invest in other asset classes and get a return while you wait for the market to correct. For example, investors were better off in the S&P 500 than most Canadian real estate over the past 5 years. Equity investors are actually ahead of real estate investors, despite the great returns on real estate.
This is a bit disengenuous. Sure, those who got in in 2009 or 2010 are better off. How many were smart enough to get out in 2008 before the 50% downdraft....not many.
Real estate at most was down 15% in 2008 to 2009 and very transiently. So this logic works well if your timing was 2009 and very poorly if it was 2008.
A dollar invested anytime in the past 5 years had a better chance of a good return in the S&P 500 than real estate. Obviously you can cherry pick dates to show whatever you want, but U.S. equities have outperformed Canadian real estate by any reasonable measure over the past 5 years. The point is that people aren't "missing out" on returns in real estate while they wait for a crash. There are plenty of asset classes doing as well or better than Canadian real estate.
^^^
One other point DearSummer.
You chose US equities and state they out performed. Correct for C$ escalation and the outperformance is not nearly as good though recently the C$ has gone down.
I have a wonderful ability to predict the past with perfect certainty. How many went into the US market at the exclusion of the Canadian market...and how many hedged the currency.
This is brilliant in hind sight but tougher to predict going forward.