Yes. The left accepts people as people.
I think that's too far the other way.
A great deal of 'the left' in the U.S, here, or anywhere else absolutely shames people, name calls, and denigrates if someone does not share their beliefs.
There's certainly a ferocious anti-Israel segment, we're not talking here about differences of opinion on Israeli policy, but fundamental belief that being Israeli or supporting Israel's existence is a sin.
Equally ask many women on the left who have expressed a desire to prioritize staying home with young children, or having a large family over a career if they feel equally valued as the career-driven.
Everyone here will know I'm a champion of gender equity, including in workplace opportunity, and should know, that I have serious concerns w/the current Israeli leadership and war efforts;
Notwithstanding that, I can see where positions different from my own, or differently nuanced are not taken well.
I also know and have worked with wonderful women, who casually discuss the evil of 'The Patriarchy' and how 'Men' are all 'x' etc; when conscious of my presence, they'll dutifully say 'doesn't apply to you'........ but...
I'm not really buying overall that the left-ist base is even remotely accepting of dissent or variation of its own dogma.
Yes, the right is every bit as bad (maybe worse)........but I won't free-pass my own side, nor do I think its useful to imagine that everyone on the other is some torch-carrying witch burner.
Most people are in-betweens, with a leaning. Most are also low-information voters, making decisions based on a mixture of personal circumstance, peer pressure, a smattering of sounds bites and a 'gut feel'.
The right obsesses over how wrong, sinful, mentally ill etc people are who don’t meet some imaginary restrictions about how people should live and live.
As noted above, I think this is too much of an overreach.
We could talk about George W. Bush, who spoke really good Spanish, and whose wife was Hispanic
Or, how about we mention Pierre Polievre whose wife Anaida is Venezuelan She is also not some demure stay-at-home mom, she's a publisher, has a had a long working career in politics, speaks 3 languages (English, Spanish and French) and is a university graduate.
How does that conform to the stereotype?
One can also note that several female Governors, current and former are Republican, not only did 'the right' vote for a woman to do a job and an arguably powerful one, these were generally all women with solid academic and professional CVs.
In the case of Nikki (Nimarata) Hailey, they also voted in a child of Sikh immigrants.
None of which is to say that sexism, racism and homophobia don't have a much larger and more open/visible home on the right side of the political spectrum; but its wrong to broad-brush everyone or even the majority of that group as closely holding such views.
.
Worth adding, 'the right' has elected multiple female Premiers in Canada, though I very much disagree with the current Premier of Alberta on a much of her policy and her presentation of same, she does have 2 university degrees and has worked steadily since graduating. In fact, more women have been elected Premier under a conservative banner (includes Social Credit, BC Liberal, and Wildrose parties) than under the Liberal banner.
Meanwhile Stephen Harper appointed an openly gay man to a senior position in his cabinet.
I disagreed with Mr. Harper on much as well; but I wouldn't conclude he spent his life tut-tutting others, viewing life through a lens of hate.