afransen
Senior Member
Somewhat reassuring that the right wing loonies are well-underperforming.
Yeah, I'm hearing CP24 pundits talking about Olivia "falling short"--she *didn't*, really; it's just that Bailao "fell long"...Interestingly enough, though, her vote share is consistent with polling.
And now the OliviAna margin's verging on 5 points--which isn't much below Miller vs Tory in '03 (and because their respective shares are lower than those of Miller & Tory, it practically sizes up the same)Art Eggleton won by less than a point over John Sewell in '80.
As did CP24.Global News has called a Chow win.
So far she’s almost spot-on Mainstreet’s last poll.Chow's share is in the ballpark, but Bailao is overshooting substantially.
So it would appear she did become the anybody but Chow candidate. She's showing what, 10 points over who her best poll?
(1) because all the other pollsters were underpolling herSo we all thought Mainstreet was off.. but they were actually spot on? Why were we so certain they were overestimating Ana?
I suspect Mainstreet were actually overestimating her based on preferences, but that she benefitted from some strategic voting.So we all thought Mainstreet was off.. but they were actually spot on? Why were we so certain they were overestimating Ana?
I look forward to her actually telling us what she wants to do at some point.If Chow can change the city for the better I'll support her.
But if Toronto remains unchanged (or gets worse) I hope she's a 1-termer