kEiThZ
Superstar
The bus has 16 to 20 stops beyond Weston - it is superior to LRT?
This. Using the number of stops to see a particular mode is rather simplistic. Should be considering the effect of that infrastructure on travel times.
The bus has 16 to 20 stops beyond Weston - it is superior to LRT?
My bet is that the Eglinton West portion of SmartTrack will be dropped pretty early on in the discussion. It just doesn't make much sense, and I don't think Tory would be that attached to one segment of his plan, especially if 90% of his plan remains intact.
And there is frankly more to be gained politically running by the NW portion of the line to Rexdale instead of along Eglinton, which can be served just as easily with an ECLRT connected to GO RER anyways (and incidentally, that will pull the transit rug under the core of FN). Like your idea of a downtown tunnel instead of using the Union Station alignment as well.
AoD
It would also give Tory the chance to put all of those revenue tools that he was touting for SmartTrack into effect for the tunnel portion, since the rail corridor sections are all being upgraded by the Province as part of the GO RER plan anyway, and thus don't need any municipal funding.
Bingo - and he can obfusticate the cost of the buried downtown portion to the city by claiming it is the city's contribution to this whole project.
AoD
Yes, a tunnel down Queen {not King!} will eventually be needed especially if the Smart Tracks program is expanded to include the Don Mills and Lakeshore West corridors...........Union will simply be beyond it's capacity.
Again this is another benefit of Smart Tracks, these things can be phased in over time where, unlike a convention DRL, where it's all or nothing and TTC riders have to wait 10 years to see any improvements.
Again this is another benefit of Smart Tracks, these things can be phased in over time where, unlike a convention DRL, where it's all or nothing and TTC riders have to wait 10 years to see any improvements.
Yup, very true. They can start SmartTrack off by running into Union while the tunnel is being built, and then switch its operations over to the tunnel, and in turn beef up 905 service to take advantage of that 'vacated' capacity.
Where abouts should the eastern portal - and where it merge with DRL-RH tunnel - be located? And would the western half of ST be a standalone line, or would it resurface again in the west?
That might be fine for a provincial project. But John Tory is promising $billions of dollars in Toronto taxpayer money on something that primarily benefits people commuting to Mississauga?If you're travelling to various places to Eg West or live along there, you might prefer the higher # of stops. However, if you're travelling between Mississauga and downtown, or Mississauga and the transferring to the Eglinton Crosstown at Mt Dennis, you might prefer a faster trip with fewer stops.
If it can be as rapid as LRT, and not impacted by traffic congestion. Yes, it probably is. Isn't that EXACTLY what David Peterson proposed for this line back in the mid-1980s? Boy, if we'd have been running dedicated BRT from Renforth to Eglinton West all these years, as originally proposed, imagine all the time people would have not wasted stuck on Eglinton.The bus has 16 to 20 stops beyond Weston - it is superior to LRT?
That might be fine for a provincial project. But John Tory is promising $billions of dollars in Toronto taxpayer money on something that primarily benefits people commuting to Mississauga?
Massive fail.
I don't know what the solution is (vis-Ã -vis Toronto taxpayers). But the mentality that we shouldn't care about those commuters has to end. When a Mississauga commuter drives, they slow down my commute. When they use transit, they may take a seat I'd get. Their commuting and travel patterns have consequences on me as a TTC user and Toronto motorist.