News   Nov 25, 2024
Work Advances at Line 5 Condos Near Yonge and Mount Pleasant
 639     0 
News   Nov 25, 2024
Pinnacle Resubmission Bumps Heights of Lakeside Project at Sherbourne and Lake Shore
 890     0 
News   Nov 25, 2024
Toronto’s Construction Boom: Prioritizing Worker Safety in High-Risk Environments
 434     0 

Zoning Reform Ideas

Tecumseh, Ontario is the latest and smallest municipality in Ontario to receive a Federal Housing Accelerator Grant from Ottawa. It does the usual like allowing four-plexes but is also amusing since the application for nearby Windsor got rejected as not being progressive enough. Numerous smaller towns are getting interested in zoning reform which is not as many would have guessed a few years ago. I guess that you can build a multiplex in a small town!
 
Did a quick tally and 57% of Ontario’s population (2021 census) has opted for the zoning reforms outlined in the Housing Accelerator Fund. I think one of the most important features of this is 4 units per lot.
 
rdaner said:
Did a quick tally and 57% of Ontario’s population (2021 census) has opted for the zoning reforms outlined in the Housing Accelerator Fund. I think one of the most important features of this is 4 units per lot.
Click to expand...
Doesn’t the utility of this depend on how many other planning rules impact whether 4 units can actually be built? (For example: setbacks, maximum FSI, etc.?)
 
Thunder Bay is the latest to get Housing Accelerator funds. Of note is the emphasis on converting unused industrial land to housing as there is a higher % there than average. This would bring the amount of population having 4 units per lot to over 60%.

As an aside I have done a quick peruse of zoning reform in The States for comparison. Although reform is common it is often the most central municipalities doing it with more suburban areas opting out. As well, there seem to be many more exemptions within these cities to increased density such as honouring restrictive covenants in gated communities and more elite neighbourhoods thus reducing % of lots covered further. Now this is based on what is happening around Seattle and Portland and isn’t a full survey.
 
Last edited:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1763333543726661718


I assume this is going to look at Green P lots along line 1 and 2? I wonder if it is even technically feasible to build anything on the lots directly above the line. Wouldn't this require expensive underpinning and structural reinforcement?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-03-02 at 4.06.53 PM.png
    Screenshot 2024-03-02 at 4.06.53 PM.png
    106.7 KB · Views: 37
I was curious about this and did a quick search of where, how big and how many of these there are. There are about 240 of various sizes, some in underground garages of buildings so untouchable, but many as smaller lots on main streets. I am assuming bus routes count as transit. Some of these lots could support a lot of units!




IMG_7925.png
IMG_7926.png
IMG_7927.png
IMG_7928.png
IMG_7929.png
IMG_7930.png
IMG_7931.png
IMG_7932.png
 
jje1000 said:
My opinion is that a good part of the pre-war downtown residential neighborhoods should be rezoned as mixed-use to allow people to open up businesses on the ground floors and expand from the existing typologies, as was the case until the sanitary regime took over in the post-war era.

Places like Cabbagetown would greatly benefit from an injection of Kensington Market into its urban fabric, IMO.
Click to expand...

This is a great idea, and in the long term it will almost inevitably happen. A street of small buildings with mixed uses is a magnet.

Kensington and Yorkville are two of the most vital and economically productive places in the whole city.

Geary Avenue is heading the same way despite being ugly and poorly located.
 
AlexBozikovic said:
Geary Avenue is heading the same way despite being ugly and poorly located.
Click to expand...
I agree with all of the above, but I would add that the ugliness and relatively poor location of Geary gave it cheap enough rents to make the interesting mix of businesses there viable. An abundance of mixed-use areas around the city could hopefully have the same effect by better balancing supply and demand for spaces like this.
 
The Housing Accelerator Fund has finalized its applications and helped create the most comprehensive zoning reform in Canada in decades. I have to say that I am impressed so far as it has avoided the piecemeal approach of other countries and been done in a timely manner.

www.theglobeandmail.com

Ottawa says its housing deals with cities will build 750,000 homes in the next decade

Ottawa says housing accelerator fund will create 750,000 new homes over next decade as 179 housing deals have been signed
www.theglobeandmail.com www.theglobeandmail.com
 
rdaner said:
The Housing Accelerator Fund has finalized its applications and helped create the most comprehensive zoning reform in Canada in decades. I have to say that I am impressed so far as it has avoided the piecemeal approach of other countries and been done in a timely manner.

www.theglobeandmail.com

Ottawa says its housing deals with cities will build 750,000 homes in the next decade

Ottawa says housing accelerator fund will create 750,000 new homes over next decade as 179 housing deals have been signed
www.theglobeandmail.com www.theglobeandmail.com
Click to expand...
What I read in the article sounded reasonable. Unfortunately I do not think this country has a stomach for the prescriptions.

And yes - zoning reform is slowly happening, but going full-force to intensification, restricting building in areas prone to climate-risk - I don’t think any (maybe BC?) provinces are really hot on doing that.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top