News   Apr 29, 2024
 111     0 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 2.8K     5 
News   Apr 26, 2024
 764     0 

What's with all the anxiety in today's youth?

Maybe it's the case that we are more open about these things now, and people in the past just "grinned and beared" it, and were less likely to voice their issues out loud even if deeply stressed.

And what makes things MORE stressful is when you are criticized because your views aren't in line with what SHOULD be accepted (i.e. siding with the bratty kids who want dress codes eliminated. I would BET the blue/green/purple haired girls (who may or may not have had multiple piercings in areas other than the ears) I knew in school would have asked their parents to NOT support the school/pull them out).
 
Agreed. Post-secondary education is nothing more than a socialist and communist propaganda machine. These institutions stifle young people's freedom of expression and they are not allowed to just be themselves. Young people are constantly under attack and indoctrinated into left-wing ideology. So it's really not surprising that young people are so stressed out and anxious these days, with university enrollment being higher than ever before.
 
I have no evidence to back up my assumptions or opinions but I would point my finger at the availability and connectivity to all forms of media.
Also, I assume parenting methods may have changed and perhaps parents are less attentive of their children's growth and development compared to before (less family oriented, more dual-income families, etc.).
 
Probably the result of not having any significant challenges in their lives. They have all this extra time to be worried about nonsense that has accumulated through previous generations and is reaching a peak point of saturation with today's media.
 
Agreed. Post-secondary education is nothing more than a socialist and communist propaganda machine. These institutions stifle young people's freedom of expression and they are not allowed to just be themselves. Young people are constantly under attack and indoctrinated into left-wing ideology. So it's really not surprising that young people are so stressed out and anxious these days, with university enrollment being higher than ever before.

That was true even when I was in university some 15 years ago. I was and still am a bit on the conservative side. I was constantly criticized because I felt it was important young people learn proper business etiquette and learned how to dress properly (these were the days when students wore PJ bottoms to class. That's way worse than the yoga pants/athleisure wear people do today)! As an undergrad, I often wore skirts or non-denim pants to class. In fact, I stopped wearing denim for three years. Some of the extremists said I was subscribing to "Eurocentric values" when proper business etiquette also includes what is generally acceptable in non-European countries (e.g. handing out business cards with both hands in many parts of Asia)). I was criticized because I wrote a personal opinion piece about how I wished my parents "presented" me (i.e. as a debutante) and that they still had (more prominent) events like that in Toronto. Oh well...
 
Universities are more meritocratic than they are socialist/communist. Grades are evidence the educational system is meritocratic. A more socialist/communist university experience would require having narrative evaluation and hiding grades from students, unless requested by the student.

Under the current education system, students are graded by how well they understand the subject. In some courses, students are graded by how well they memorize certain things. Under narrative evaluation, students won't be pressured to get good grades. An example of a post-secondary educational institute that uses narrative evaluation is Evergreen State College, which is Simpsons creator Matt Groening's alma mater.

Many families from Asia are strong believers in meritocracy and yes, parents who believe in meritocracy push their children extremely hard in getting good grades. Meritocracy, as we know it, is invented in China.

Many believers of meritocracy should realize that not everyone would become an IBM Watson, no matter how hard they push. Many people have different strengths and weaknesses, which standardized tests don't capture (and often punish those who learn differently from what the teacher expects).

Meritocracy, in my opinion, is the main source of stress among today's young people.
 
I may be totally simplifying a complex issue here but I think there is some fundamental truth to my particular thought.

One major change with today's youth is the connectivity of everyone. It's the ease of sharing information. Whereas in the old days, your social circle was typically limited to people you knew in the neighborhood. The smartest person you knew and the dumbest person you knew was picked out of a vastly smaller sample size. Today, you're exposed to the smartest person, not just in town, but in the whole entire Internet-connected world.

In the past, it was mind-blowing to be able to solve the Rubik's cube and if you did, you told your neighbor. Now, it's not enough to just solve it. You have to solve it in under 10 seconds for anyone to even care anymore, since the Internet world wouldn't even bat an eye, and they'll be quick to tell you that someone else did it in half the time already!

Facebook, Instagram...everyone posts the best of the best selfies. Taking and retaking posed 'candid' shots until they look perfect. People share amazing travel pics and highlight over the top events & parties they go to. I get the feeling that it can be pretty easy to feel 'not good enough' when you're constantly bombarded with these type of images.
 
How else do you grade or evaluate? If I'm learning to become a pilot, I need to demonstrate I can fly the plane.
Just a simple pass or fail. For being a pilot, there is not much of a noticeable difference between barely passing and passing with flying colours in the grand scheme of things. When one takes an airplane, the passengers won't care if the individual pilots flying the plane barely passed flight school or passed with flying colours.

The difference in getting 90% in a course and 100% in a course is very much minimal in the grand scheme of things, but there are some parents who consider 90% a failure and that would be very stressful for a student who knows that 100% is not attainable for some courses and 90% is already extremely good.
 
There are likely several reasons for the apparent uptick in anxiety disorders. As has been mentioned up-thread, we know more about anxiety these days, so identifying the problem and seeking help for it has become more common. The ubiquity of electronics, social media, &c. also plays a role, as does the future imagined for the young (poor job prospects, lack of affordable housing and even environmental catastrophe).

Part of it likely also has to do with poor diet, lack of exercise and perhaps even changes to the gut's microbiome (which have been linked to the rising prevalence of various autoimmune disorders).
 
Good points lesouris. With my own t'ween daughters we've done our best to mitigate these risks.

First of all, they're not connected whatsoever, no Facebook or other social networks, no devices, our house pc is in the kitchen and they need to ask mom to unlock her tablet. I know that sounds absolutely tyrannical, but interestingly, they've shown no interest in sitting in front of screens with their pals, and instead their pals instead come over to our house. When I ask them about their lack of screen time, they're rather dismissive of kids that spend their time on social, or even worse in their minds are the boys who spend their days alone in the basement playing Mindcraft or whatnot. Instead of electronic connectivity, we've encouraged their friends to come over to our house to hang out, which gives the added benefit of knowing who their friends are - so far they've chosen great friends (positive outlooks, caring/sharing, and education/future-focused, overall kind kids).

Second of all, we've taught our daughters to think of the long game. It's not about passing the test, but about aiming your education to something you think you might enjoy. From a young age I've told them both that my only requirement is that they stay in maths and science through high school, because far too many girls drop out of these subjects and then end up pursuing useless degrees in university. I have help in this with their aunt, a well paid professional structural engineer. Not that I care what job they take on, but with math and science I feel they'll be more competitively placed for whatever job they want to do, from dance instructor to astronaut. My girls do have math and french tutors, but one on one, and designed not to add pressure, but instead how to cope and work through their daily studies. So, school stress is pretty light here. Interestingly, my girls have been very driven personally about education, but when I hear them talking, it's about the long game, not aceing some specific test.

Third, free exercise and electronic-free downtime. There's no organized sports teams in the Beez household, yet my girls are fit and trim. Instead we're out on our bicycles, walking the dog, running with their friends, or our favourite, swimming in Regent Park for hours on end. So, no competitive pressure there. When we're down, you'll often find the lot of us in the livingroom reading book, yes, real paper ones we get from the local library or our favourite trips to Chapters to peruse the young adult chapter books. Both my girls are voracious readers in English and starting to be in French.

Fourth, excellent diets. No soda, few stimulants (caffeine, sugar), white bread or sugary cereals in my house, and it's not that we ban them, the kids just don't want them, nor do we end every meal with a sugary treat. Schools have done a good job telling kids to stay away from them. Their friends look away in mock horror at my girls' favourite pizza toppings, broccoli, spinach and chicken on olive oil with thin whole wheat crust. I think we go through a ton of brussel sprouts a month, and a zoos worth of bananas. But it seems to work, as they are fit and have good concentration. Not that we don't go through a few tubs of ice cream a month in the summer months, they are kids afterall.

Lastly, focus on strong family foundations and economic stability. My wife and I chose each other carefully, did everything we could to ensure both our relationship and our economic circumstances were well founded before having kids. And our lives are about the kids, so I've worked hard to ensure I can do my part to support the family while not working long hours. Meanwhile my wife works only half time, meaning she's available more for the kids. A big part of family stability for me is one of one time, which means I go for walks with one kid, drop by Starbucks and listen about what's going on in their lives. We did have some laughs together when they started sex ed, but we're pretty open about all that stuff too, no subject is out of bounds. Eating almost every meal together at the dining room table helps too.

So, in summary, my plan to keep youth anxiety at bay is: limited connectivity replaced by physical connections, long-term focus on education plus tutors to guide not drill, free exercise as opposed to organized sports, stimulant-free mostly low-glycemic diets and most importantly providing a safe, open and strong family setting. None of this was easy, and took a lot of planning on my wife's and my part. And things could still go crazy, as we've all heard of the kids from seamingly perfect homes getting into distress, so I'm not delusional to think I've got anxiety licked, but if I can get these girls into strong women with healthy self esteem I'll know I've done my best.
 
Last edited:
But Admiral,

It might be fine that your kids aren't on social now, but it's going to be a different story once they're in high school. Some schools expect students to at least use the school's private network. Other schools require kids to carry laptops/tablets (well, private schools, anyway. My alma mater has required its Grade 9-12 students to have laptops since 2002). And post-secondary? Well, forget about it then.
 
It might be fine that your kids aren't on social now, but it's going to be a different story once they're in high school.
IMO, it's about setting foundational thinking, not lifetime barriers. And by post-secondary they're adults, likely away from home, and can do what they please. You have to let them go, and trust you've done your best.
 

Back
Top