nfitz
Superstar
I'm puzzled how the 80 km/hr vehicle speed rather than 100 km/hr is a constraint.Max operational speed is 10 km slower than the max vehicle speed (ex 70kmh)
I haven't read the rest of that figure. Hard to take is seriously now.
I'm puzzled how the 80 km/hr vehicle speed rather than 100 km/hr is a constraint.Max operational speed is 10 km slower than the max vehicle speed (ex 70kmh)
cant speak to 1)
but regarding 2) theres basically 3 reasons
a) Regarding the Traynor section, this was initially one of the faster sections but the region had to construct a temporary crossing (no boom gates) in this area after local groups felt they were cut off from the near by shopping areas. Ever since this, the lrt has to travel slower in this section (https://kitchener.ctvnews.ca/traynor-vanier-residents-finally-getting-their-lrt-crossing-1.4643619?cache=yes?clipId=89619)
b) The sharp turn at Hayward stemmed from efforts to reduce expropriation and is easily the slowest point in the line.
c) The lrt's speed limits are lower than cars in this section (even in completely straight track (Courtland))
3) the high speed section was and still is freight track so the turning radii are more giving. This + the added grade separation are what allow the lrt to go fast.
a) I agree they should add bus route info in these announcements
b) This is fairly common worldwide with boom gates . Perhaps if they didn't go with the center platforms itd be easier to deboard.
c) I think you are correct
I'd like to also plug my diagram which explains these issues in detail:
View attachment 583843
Really quite a good plan. Overnight network is huge, way bigger than I think anyone anticipated. I don’t think this covers north Cambridge as well as the map suggests, but it’s fairly underdeveloped today so I don’t think it’s too much of an issue.
![]()
GRT Business Plan
Grand River Transit's business plan will provide a roadmap to guide transit investment priorities to 2030 and beyondwww.engagewr.ca
GRT 2025-2030 Business Plan
Image 1: Frequent Transit Network, and Highway Express.
View attachment 609949
Conventional Bus and Train Business Plan
Guide the expansion of conventional bus and train services, to ensure GRT can meet the needs of a rapidly-growing population and support the Region’s commitment to reducing community emissions.
The plan focuses on strategic transit priorities identified by riders, the community, GRT and the Region:
The following proposed investments would help achieve these strategic priorities:
- Frequency, Speed, Customer-driven innovation, Strategic new coverage, and Simple and intuitive transit
Image 2: Overnight network
- Frequent transit network: Service every 10 minutes on weekdays, 7 a.m. - 7 p.m., and every 15 minutes all other times, on 16 routes in Cambridge, Kitchener, and Waterloo
- Highlighted network concept in red. Proposed network routes includes 301, 302, 201, 202, 203, 204, 205, 206, 7, 8, 12, 16, 20, 51, 53, 61.
- Riders will benefit from improved transfers, save up to 6 minutes during peak times and 8 minutes during off-peak times.
- Strategic new coverage: Strategic expansion focused on new growth and industrial areas with streamlined routes for useful improvements to coverage
- Focus areas includes Cambridge Industries, Southwest Kitchener, North Waterloo
- Consistent schedules: Enhance frequency to make schedules more consistent all-day, everyday, so more transit trips are more equitable and intuitive for more riders
- Focus on Improved Evening Schedules,
- New and improved weekend service
- More consistent schedules all day during the weekday as the GRT bus fleet grows.
- Highway express: Introduce frequent and rapid single-seat service between Cambridge, Kitchener, and Waterloo, giving riders more time back in their day
- Highlighted in concept in Green.
- Service every 15 min, all day, every day.
- Four stops at Cambridge Centre, Pinebush, Sportsworld, Conestoga.
- Potential time savings for riders of up to 35 minutes between Cambridge and Waterloo.
- Supports ridership growth ahead of Stage 2 ION and Cambridge-Guelph passenger rail projects
- Overnight network: Launch 24/7 service on key routes, with 30-minute overnight frequency supporting shift workers, students, and core areas
- Overnight service every 30 minutes on core routes
- Industrial trips to support 24/7 operations (areas shaded in blue on map) [Not sure how this is going to work]
- Operational adjustments for transit security and station and stop improvements considered to support safe trips for overnight operators and riders
- Preliminary proposed overnight route includes Routes 301 (modified bus service integrated with routes 7 and 91), 302 (modified service integrated with route 51), 201, 202, 204, 8, 12, and industrial trips.
View attachment 609950
Excellent Business Plan overall.
Though the map really does highlight the absolutely insane/non-existent road grid in K-W.
Fixing all of it is out of the question, but the region really does need to take a closer look at getting some additional streets that run clear across town either E-W or N-S.
Elsewise, A really great initiative. Better transit service, when fully delivered than most U.S. cities. and all but a handful of Canadian ones.
Second basically everything you say here. I’ll add that I got to see firsthand the progressive overcrowding of the 201- travelled from UW to around Conestoga South. The huge student influx has meant the 2 or 3 parallel routes running from Block Line/Fairview to Conestoga are all standing room only most of the time. Personally, I think the iON should head there instead of Sportsworld.KW does have a decent N-S, E-W grid, its certainly not a perfect grid but the arterials due tend to follow a N-S, E-W pattern. The main E-W network consists of Ottawa, Victoria, Fairway, Bleams, Block Line, New Dundee, Bridgeport, Erb, Columbia, University (for the most part), then N-S you have Fischer-Hallman, Westmount, King, Weber, Lackner and River.
Sure its not a convential grid but it works suprisingly well all things considered. The only real exception to the grid is Lancaster and Highland which both do their own bizarre things but with the network that exists it's not hard to get around the city.
In terms of the business plan the 10 minute service has been asked for locally for a while, right now during rush hour the 7/8/12/16 are all sardine cans (not a common occurrence in KW, the busses take longer unloading at stops from how crowded they are then actual travel) and the 201 is already running on 10 minute frequencies and is still horrific most days.
The LRT is the only disappointing thing as it could definitely use some improvements at various times of day but with it being a PPP there's only so much the Region can do with regards to that.
Second basically everything you say here. I’ll add that I got to see firsthand the progressive overcrowding of the 201- travelled from UW to around Conestoga South. The huge student influx has meant the 2 or 3 parallel routes running from Block Line/Fairview to Conestoga are all standing room only most of the time. Personally, I think the iON should head there instead of Sportsworld.
All students (incl. the unis) are contributing to routes in City of Waterloo and north Kitch as well. The 7 (King St) is shockingly crowded despite the LRT, and its local nature is severely impacted by the lack of bus lanes or TSP. The iON is not cutting into that catchment well, and the 2051 planning horizon for a solution is too far.
Point is, the uptake on the bus network has been huge, and is magnified further still on a few key corridors.
Ironically, I also do not find WR’s road network that bad to drive nor use transit on- I wouldn’t call it intuitive, but the ‘weird’ roads are like ‘desire routes’; I’ve seen few capacity/network gaps, nor discontinuities on most trips. Perhaps since the region isn’t on a lake, entering or bypassing the core(s) is a non-issue. London residents may empathize, but its refreshing coming from Ham/TO where everyone converges on the same streets.
A report on the December 03, 2024 'Sustainability, Infrastructure, and Development Committee Agenda' is published regarding the proposed central station. I have attached the link to the agenda. The reports are found within section 7.1 of the agenda. Constriction is now set to begin in 2025, and the HUB is to be completed in 2029. Will we ever see this project get off the ground? However, exciting steps are being taken with the City of Kitchener, giving the Region the assumption of Duke St, between Briethaupt and Victoria! : https://pub-regionofwaterloo.escrib...-b07a-cfd9214f8d80&Agenda=Agenda&lang=English
A tender was just posted. But it's for the design and engineering... https://regionofwaterloo.bidsandten...r/Detail/dffde2bd-755b-4375-b37e-454fc0b631a9Current progress sees that proper work begins next year (maybe, finally...), meaning a tender should be posted in the coming months.
Cambridge councillors raised concerns at Tuesday night’s council meeting about a lack of clear plans for future transit service, especially the ION light rail extension to Cambridge.
Regional staff had come to present the new Grand River Transit (GRT) Business Plan, which outlines how transit will grow over the next few years.
The plan includes more frequent buses, better service for townships, overnight routes, and new airport connections. It also highlights the need to prepare for a growing population that is expected to reach 1 million in the region.
But Coun. Adam Cooper pointed out, “One of the elephants in the room is the lack of any plan for the ION Stage 2.”
“If we are going to get it, then in what kind of form and when? And if not, then I think they also deserve to know that too,” he said.
Regional staff said the ION Stage 2 project — the extension of light rail from Kitchener to the Ainslie Terminal in Cambridge — is not yet funded. But they said an initial business case will go to the Regional council in November, comparing rail and bus rapid transit options.
“We’re very hopeful that we’ll have regional council support for that,” staff said. They also said the region is working with Guelph and other local governments to push the province to take over the Cambridge-to-Guelph rail project — calling it “the largest unserviced commuter corridor outside the GTHA.”
Cooper further asked if higher levels of government were open to helping pay the estimated $4.5 billion cost. Staff said they hope for a similar funding model as Stage 1, where the federal, provincial, and regional governments each paid one-third.
Coun. Helen Shwery asked if new bus routes would help students from Cambridge get to the University of Waterloo and Wilfrid Laurier faster. Staff explained that while a highway express bus will save time, students will still rely on the frequent transit network near campuses for the final leg of the trip.
There was also discussion about access to the Region of Waterloo International Airport in Breslau.
Coun. Scott Hamilton said people don’t want to drive and leave their cars when flying.
“Everyone wants to get to the airport by bus,” he said.
Staff explained that buses already run from Kitchener to the airport and that more service is coming, but Mayor Jan Liggett pointed out these routes do not directly serve Cambridge.
“Just to put it out there, that’s two Kitchener routes into the airport and zero from Cambridge,” Liggett said.
Coun. Mike Devine asked how much land has been bought for the LRT.
Staff did not have the number but said some properties near stations had been purchased and would report back.
When asked what would happen if the project doesn’t move ahead, they said the region would likely sell the land.
The plan also includes an expansion of overnight bus service, new on-demand transit in rural townships, and new routes to serve growing areas in Cambridge and other cities.
Coun. Nicholas Ermeta asked whether seniors could ride for free or at a lower cost. Staff said they use an income-based model instead.
Starting in July, people who qualify will get a 55 per cent discount through the Affordable Transit Program.
The final GRT Business Plan will be presented to regional council in June.




