rbt
Senior Member
In Toronto we'd obviously need Steeles done, and probably McNicoll too...
This is less obvious to me. Why would a low-speed (it'll run slower within city limits) relatively infrequent train require this?
Nobody will be horribly put out if traffic on Steeles needs to pause for 90 seconds every 30 minutes. I'd like to see the GradeX risk number for those crossings with VIAs plan. I expect they'd rank below the top 10 crossings in the GTA; that gives VIA a couple years to prove the business plan (or scale it back) before committing to major upgrades.
Last edited: