VIA Rail

[reaperexpress]

So in those intervening hours, nobody had the authority, ability or foresight to get provisions for the passengers, maybe even a bus as soon as they got to a siding or crossing, in that deep wilderness area of Quebec? Here we go again.

Not being a railroader, but it took 3 hours for another train to hook-up and haul it back a short distance?

On the 6th of March when I took Via from Ottawa to Toronto they held us for an hour in Brockville with the intention to back up to Cornwall to rescue a stranded train from Montreal. After an hour they let us go because the following train from Ottawa showed up (they were the ones who ended up rescuing that train)

Even though our delay was only an hour, the crew ordered pizza to Kingston Station, which they picked up during our station stop there and handed out during the trip. Had they not given us pizza, I would have been quite hungry by the time I arrived in Toronto since I had intended to get lunch after I arrived.

It seems quite absurd that a train that was stranded next to a public road, only a 5 minute drive from the nearest town, and 60 minutes from the major station in Québec City would go for 5+ hours without being at least being reprovisionned for food and water. This was hardly deep wilderness. Is there no food delivery service in St-Apolinnaire, Laurier-Station or Québec City?

The statement from Via Rail in the TVA article says that passengers received drinks, snacks and a meal during the delay. Are they implying that that is sufficient food and drink for 14 hours? The passenger interviewed confirmed that they received food and drink, but only for the first 4 hours, leaving them without food or water for the remaining 6 hours of delay.

 

[crs1026]

So in those intervening hours, nobody had the authority, ability or foresight to get provisions for the passengers, maybe even a bus as soon as they got to a siding or crossing, in that deep wilderness area of Quebec? Here we go again.

Not being a railroader, but it took 3 hours for another train to hook-up and haul it back a short distance?

There are explanations being offered by usually reliable sources on Facebook (which being unofficial, I won't propagate) about why the rescue of the equipment took all day (hint: more than just the trainset had problems) - but these don't explain why the focus was on rescuing the equipment and not the passengers.

Sure seems to me that there needs to be a higher power that takes charge for any delay where passengers are kept on train for over x hours. I feel the same way about airplanes held on the tarmac or out of gate. Passengers should not have to come equipped with enough living supplies to camp out.

- Paul

 

[reaperexpress]

Sure seems to me that there needs to be a higher power that takes charge for any delay where passengers are kept on train for over x hours. I feel the same way about airplanes held on the tarmac or out of gate. Passengers should not have to come equipped with enough living supplies to camp out.

This is what I'm thinking as well. At minimum there should be additional staff who can drop their regular duties and be called upon to assist the response teams when delays are expected to be over x hours. Perhaps the additional office staff could help out with tasks such as figuring out how to get food and water to the train.

Here's a comparable incident from last week in the Netherlands. A train had broken down in the countryside. The first response team drove with lights and sirens to the train to assess the situation and coordinate further response. They ordered bottles of water, to be brought by the second unit on site. They ordered a shuttle bus but there was no public road adjacent to the train so they evacuated passengers onto the railway and escorted them as they walked 15 minutes along the railway to the nearest roadway crossing where the bus could pick them up.

 

[dowlingm]

According to groups.io, 2300/2209 was the guilty party, and a pair of P42s bracketing a HEP car fetched it.

The question that occurs to me is - shouldn’t Montreal-Quebec City services be busy enough to justify some double track on the Drummondville Subdivision in the foreseeable future, and not merely a scattering of sidings? A rescue train (with sufficient capacity) could have cross decked those passengers off.

 

[Allandale25]

The incident is getting some media attention. Stressful situation for the crew and passengers.

10-hour delay on VIA Rail train to Quebec City

A chaotic 13-hour VIA Rail train ride to Quebec City – delayed by two mechanical issues – reached a boiling point Saturday after an employee allegedly pushed a passenger before grabbing another’s phone right from his hands while he filmed the situation. What should have been, at the most, a...

montreal.citynews.ca

 

[nfitz]

I suspect it will get media attention mostly because of the report that a VIA staff member was physically assaulting passengers than because the train was late.

 

[crs1026]

The question that occurs to me is - shouldn’t Montreal-Quebec City services be busy enough to justify some double track on the Drummondville Subdivision in the foreseeable future, and not merely a scattering of sidings? A rescue train (with sufficient capacity) could have cross decked those passengers off.

The number and spacing of controlled sidings is pretty reasonable, actually - in keeping with what VIA has on its own single track lines, and possibly more than a vanilla HFR proposal might require. . If more frequent trains were planned, one might look at extending some sidings to allow freight to clear more expeditiously.

Try guessing where double tracking might be needed for such a contingency..... if one added track for that purpose, one would have to double track much of the line.

The bigger question that a look at the timetable begs is..... what is the service plan for this line post HxR? My angst is that VIA might be reducing, not adding trains, and that might actually drive withdrawal of some sidings..

- Paul

 

[micheal_can]

The bigger question that a look at the timetable begs is..... what is the service plan for this line post HxR? My angst is that VIA might be reducing, not adding trains, and that might actually drive withdrawal of some sidings..

- Paul

Quebec support for high speed rail could be a challenge for High Frequency project - Trains

MONTREAL — With political support lining up in Quebec behind high speed rail service between that province and Ontario, Canada’s Transport Minister — who has been working to advance a more conventional-speed “High Frequency Rail” project — has said he is open to a hybrid approach along the...

www.trains.com

My understanding is they would use the line north of the River.

 

[crs1026]

My understanding is they would use the line north of the River.

Exactly. And then what happens to service to the communites along this line?

- Paul

 

[micheal_can]

Exactly. And then what happens to service to the communites along this line?

- Paul

The same thing planned for the Kingston Sub.

 

[Urban Sky]

This is what I'm thinking as well. At minimum there should be additional staff who can drop their regular duties and be called upon to assist the response teams when delays are expected to be over x hours. Perhaps the additional office staff could help out with tasks such as figuring out how to get food and water to the train.

When I was a planner at the TTC, the office staff were all trained for front line duty for the purpose of helping out with crowd control during the Pan Am games. My office was in North York Centre so during the van attack I walked to Sheppard-Yonge station to help with crowd control there, since trains were offloading thousands of confused customers who had intended to go to Finch.

Here's a comparable incident from last week in the Netherlands. A train had broken down in the countryside. The first response team drove with lights and sirens to the train to assess the situation and coordinate further response. They ordered bottles of water, to be brought by the second unit on site. They ordered a shuttle bus but there was no public road adjacent to the train so they evacuated passengers onto the railway and escorted them as they walked 15 minutes along the railway to the nearest roadway crossing where the bus could pick them up.

I’m not going to deny that the way in which VIA’s Operations Control Centre has responded to this incident appears to have been once again woefully inadequate, but VIA will always be at a structural disadvantage due to the fact that they never operate more than maybe 20 trains over a network which spreads six thousand kilometers from Halifax to Vancouver and Prince Rupert. That’s about the same number of moving trains as OC Transpo has to deal with on the Confederation Line, but spread over a surface area two orders of magnitude larger than the Netherlands.

Even worse, unlike transit operators like the TTC or Metrolinx, which operate sizeable bus networks on top of its rail networks, VIA only operates these trains and therefore can’t just redeploy bus dispatching staff to help out with its rail dispatching.

As for your example with the Netherlands, densely populated European countries can afford to space out Emergency Managers 100 km or less from each other, but if you did the same with VIA, they would end up being a signficant percentage of VIA’s workforce with less than one emergency to respond to per employee and year. It should also be noted that these “Emergency Managers” are usually deployed by the infrastructure manager (ProRail in the UK, DB InfraGo in Germany) and that absolutely makes sense, because even in Europe they couldn’t afford to duplicate such an expensive and lowly-utilized resource across multiple operators. However, even for CN and CP it might not make much economic sense to duplicate such emergency response (since their non-human cargo doesn’t usually need to be physically reached within only a few hours to avoid human harm) and with remote roadways facing similar issues, I would propose to create such capabilities at the federal level directly with emergency supplies and even helicopters placed at strategic locations.

I’m pretty sure I already said something very similar after a Christmas storm brought VIA’s Lakeshore services to a meltdown 2 or 3 years ago, but nobody can respond effectively and efficiently to such emergencies unless you bundle the transportation networks and areas to be overseen, as you need to justify having multiple employees available immediately and more on very short notice…

The bigger question that a look at the timetable begs is..... what is the service plan for this line post HxR? My angst is that VIA might be reducing, not adding trains, and that might actually drive withdrawal of some sidings..

- Paul

Whereas I still fail to understand your rationale for foreseeing a massive decline of Lakeshore services post-HxR, I do share your concerns about VIA service on the Drummondville subdivision. One just has to add up the reapective population figures to grasp how much the population centers served along the Lakeshore and Saint-Lawrence dwarf that of SHYA and DRMV…

 

[UtakataNoAnnex]

The incident is getting some media attention. Stressful situation for the crew and passengers.

10-hour delay on VIA Rail train to Quebec City

A chaotic 13-hour VIA Rail train ride to Quebec City – delayed by two mechanical issues – reached a boiling point Saturday after an employee allegedly pushed a passenger before grabbing another’s phone right from his hands while he filmed the situation. What should have been, at the most, a...

montreal.citynews.ca

Heads should be rolling over this. Just saying.

 

[Urban Sky]

Heads should be rolling over this. Just saying.

I suggest you might want to actually work in a customer-facing job where you might find yourself locked with hundreds of increasingly anxious and exasperated passengers into a confined space while their 3-hour trip and your 4-hour shift unexpectedly triples in length before you start volunteering your opinions about what kind of behaviors might be excusable given the circumstances and which ones aren’t…

Disclaimer: I have not watched the video footage, in respect of the privacy of everyone involved in such a stressful and extraordinarily uncomfortable situation.

 

[micheal_can]

I suggest you might want to actually work in a customer-facing job where you find yourself locked with hundreds of increasingly exasperated and anxious passengers into a confined space while their 3-hour trip and your 4-hour shift unexpectedly triples in length before you start volunteering your opinions about what kind of behaviors might be excusable given the circumstances and which ones aren’t…

These trains are new. Should we ignore that and be ok with the poor performance? These new sets are supposed to bring reliability back to Via.

 

[lenaitch]

I’m not going to deny that the way in which VIA’s Operations Control Centre has responded to this incident appears to have been once again woefully inadequate, but VIA will always be at a structural disadvantage due to the fact that they never operate more than maybe 20 trains over a network which spreads six thousand kilometers from Halifax to Vancouver and Prince Rupert. That’s about the same number of moving trains as OC Transpo has to deal with on the Confederation Line, but spread over a surface area two orders of magnitude larger than the Netherlands.

Even worse, unlike transit operators like the TTC or Metrolinx, which operate sizeable bus networks on top of its rail networks, VIA only operates these trains and therefore can’t just redeploy bus dispatching staff to help out with its rail dispatching.

As for your example with the Netherlands, densely populated European countries can afford to space out Emergency Managers 100 km or less from each other, but if you did the same with VIA, they would end up being a signficant percentage of VIA’s workforce with less than one emergency to respond to per employee and year. It should also be noted that these “Emergency Managers” are usually deployed by the infrastructure manager (ProRail in the UK, DB InfraGo in Germany) and that absolutely makes sense, because even in Europe they couldn’t afford to duplicate such an expensive and lowly-utilized resource across multiple operators. However, even for CN and CP it might not make much economic sense to duplicate such emergency response (since their non-human cargo doesn’t usually need to be physically reached within only a few hours to avoid human harm) and with remote roadways facing similar issues, I would propose to create such capabilities at the federal level directly with emergency supplies and even helicopters placed at strategic locations.

I’m pretty sure I already said something very similar after a Christmas storm brought VIA’s Lakeshore services to a meltdown 2 or 3 years ago, but nobody can respond effectively and efficiently to such emergencies unless you bundle the transportation networks and areas to be overseen, as you need to justify having multiple employees available immediately and more on very short notice…


Whereas I still fail to understand your rationale for foreseeing a massive decline of Lakeshore services post-HxR, I do share your concerns about VIA service on the Drummondville subdivision. One just has to add up the reapective population figures to grasp how much the population centers served along the Lakeshore and Saint-Lawrence dwarf that of SHYA and DRMV…

My brother used to drive for Trentway-Wagar and was dispatched to pick up stranded VIA passengers a number of times. None 'greenfield' that I recall. Certainly not expedient since people need to be called in then deadhead to the locations. Heck, at that time of day they could have scared up some school bus drivers or even an o/t shift or two from Drummondville Transit.

Back when the earth was still cooling and not much technology existed, every detachment of my former police service had an 'emergency services' binder listing all manner of local services along with contact persons/phone numbers, etc. which had to be updated or confirmed annually. It's not that hard.