I was on Line 2 westbound from Bathurst when it was announced on the subway cars....except *no-one* in the car I was in could hear or understand WTF the announcement was about.
Similar to this does Toronto prioritize paving along the +10 min bus routes? (or paving at all?)
It was on a Express route off peak and I guess the higher speeds are what brought the rattling to a level I could no longer bear.
Let me answer that by observing that *almost all* announcements from a direct source (e.g. not wireless) are of good audio quality. The acoustics on a platform or large echoing space are another consideration, but that's not the point of discussion.but am I to understand that messages from the driver are clear and ones from HQ are not? Or is that just my takeaway.
Concrete is much, much worse for driving believe me. The minute it starts to crumble, there's no amount of pothole filling in the world that would make it a pleasant experience to drive on. With asphalt you can just remove the top layer, and repave if necessary. With concrete it literally involves digging the whole thing out and starting the paving process from scratch.It was on a Express route off peak and I guess the higher speeds are what brought the rattling to a level I could no longer bear. I don't even care about "paving" anymore..asphalt in this city doesn't seem to cut it. For me I'd like to see pouring of roads. As in concrete. I think it could be the secret to prevent the humpy broken pavement we've become too accustomed to.
Nothing is worse than the fishbowls. Those things would rattle over every bump. I once hit a speedbump on the 86E in one, I am quite surprised the windows remained intact. The windows rattled but somehow didn't break from shaking around in the frame.
Concrete is much, much worse for driving believe me. The minute it starts to crumble, there's no amount of pothole filling in the world that would make it a pleasant experience to drive on. With asphalt you can just remove the top layer, and repave if necessary. With concrete it literally involves digging the whole thing out and starting the paving process from scratch.
Although concrete has a longer lifespan, it's much worse and harsher on tires in general. Tires tend to wear out quicker due to the amount of heat generated, and the resulting in tread loss. However, concrete is good at dealing with very heavy equipment, which is why you see them in bus terminals and airport runways/aprons.
The U.S loves to use concrete everywhere, especially with their freeways but the difference is night and day compared to driving on asphalt (in other words, asphalt gives a much better driving experience). Americans will even tell you that when they drive in Canada they find the experience much more pleasant.
Asphalt vs. Concrete: Not a Black and White Choice
https://www.ayresassociates.com/asphalt-vs-concrete-not-black-white-choice/
- By Ayres
- May 25, 2016
IMO they should really look at doing the busy sections of the 4xx in concrete like 407. The benefits of it in terms of maintenance and lifespan vs asphalt is there.
There seems to be perpetual roadworks on the 401 that just never seems to end. At least after concrete is laid there will be a 5 year respite before they need to do repairs.
IMO they should really look at doing the busy sections of the 4xx in concrete like 407. The benefits of it in terms of maintenance and lifespan vs asphalt is there.
There seems to be perpetual roadworks on the 401 that just never seems to end. At least after concrete is laid there will be a 5 year respite before they need to do repairs.
Asphalt vs. Concrete: Not a Black and White Choice
https://www.ayresassociates.com/asphalt-vs-concrete-not-black-white-choice/
- By Ayres
- May 25, 2016
There is a lot of concrete with a layer of asphalt on top being installed right now. If you look in the burbs they use concrete at busy bus stops and then asphalt elsewhere (note that Mississauga has realized if you colour the bus-only areas red more people will obey the law but that would blow the mind of our bureaucrats).
There are lots of options out there. The problem is Toronto/TTC does nothing.
If there was a wye, then there'd be a fewer people changing at Yonge-Bloor from Line 2, as they'd be more likely to stay on their train, and go around the loop. This would have reduced the dwell time at Yonge-Bloor station allowing for increased frequency on Line 1.And how does that hinder the system today?
Given how much the Line 2 trains seem to back up approaching both Kipling and Kennedy during peak, I'm taking that current 2.5 minute design with a grain of salt!They were designed to run trains at 2.5 minute headways, but not much beyond that.
Only one Flexity can fit on the 504 (or 505) platform at Broadview. To easily handle current demand, there'd never be bunching; even with the new 504 service pattern I've seen bunched 504s on Broadview in both directions (and a lot more 15-minute gaps than I used to see!). They need to be able to fit 2 or 3 Flexitys at Broadview so they can schedule recovery time.I would suggest that it (and the loop at Dundas West) can easily handle the current demand if the TTC were to think a bit more critically.