I wonder how long the 504 split will last. When they tried it on Queen it was an abysmal failure and no doubt this will be too.
In theory it is a good idea to split the route on either side of Downtown but in practice it is not. When people need to remember is that vehicles need places to layover and when you have vehicles laying over on non-rev trackage (I saw non-rev in the sense that it is not a dedicated route i.e Parliament V.S. King) you will have headway issues.
I give it 3 months before the 514 is either reinstated or the split is dropped.
I mean, is the "to" really that necessary? We don't want passengers waiting on platforms to read long displays about their train, increasing dwell times (this shouldn't be a problem here, but it can be in NYC). Leaving the "to" as lowercase removes our attention from it, making evident to the reader the important information: Line 1 — Finch.Never mind system level design consistency - they still can't get the typographic design right.
AoD
They just have to meet TTC's requirements for this bid.Obviously lowest bidder. Only two colours, black and amber.
Would have preferred a yellow ball with the 1 in it, but that would have cost a few more pennies.
Obviously lowest bidder. Only two colours, black and amber.
Would have preferred a yellow ball with the 1 in it, but that would have cost a few more pennies.
I mean, is the "to" really that necessary? We don't want passengers waiting on platforms to read long displays about their train, increasing dwell times (this shouldn't be a problem here, but it can be in NYC). Leaving the "to" as lowercase removes our attention from it, making evident to the reader the important information: Line 1 — Finch.
It's extremely subtle, but there's probably a reason for it.
Some buses fell through the crack and didn't receive the 929 sign programming.There’s a separate 29E express service in addition to the 929. I guess it’s the same service.
I mean, is the "to" really that necessary? We don't want passengers waiting on platforms to read long displays about their train, increasing dwell times (this shouldn't be a problem here, but it can be in NYC). Leaving the "to" as lowercase removes our attention from it, making evident to the reader the important information: Line 1 — Finch.
It's extremely subtle, but there's probably a reason for it.
The Screens on the subway trains aren't that big, to begin with. The font size is just fine on them for the distance that most riders will be from it, if you have difficulty reading it then see an eye doctor immediately because you probably need glasses, or have some other serious vision problems.i dont understand why ttc doesnt like capped letters. their font size is so small that you can hardly see it properly and theyre underutilising the physical screen size.