the lemur
Senior Member
The thing I'm most impressed by with the new artic buses is the interior lighting. So much brighter inside than the non-artics, makes a big difference at night and in the winter.
The thing I'm most impressed by with the new artic buses is the interior lighting. So much brighter inside than the non-artics, makes a big difference at night and in the winter.
Do you find there's any difference in terms of how crowded it is? Or any differences with frequency or reliability?
I've been wondering for a while why the buses are so dirty in the winter compared to the streetcar, even on slow downtown routes. I assume most of the splatter is from other vehicles, and yet it's always so shocking being on a bus, instead of a streetcar, in the winter, with it often so heavy that you can't see out the window - which I've never experienced on a streetcar.Buses and streetcars are usually washed before they go out in the morning, unless there is a malfunction. Since they are out on the road most of the day, they will get covered with dirt, slush, and spray as the day goes on. Maybe the rain today will wash some of the accumulated dirt off.
It is currently, but part of the justification is how much money they'd be saving with less operators. Presumably once a route is fully converted to Artics they will reduce the frequency.The frequency is about the same as it was before they were introduced; I've yet to experience the same kind of crowding as before.
I've been wondering for a while why the buses are so dirty in the winter compared to the streetcar, even on slow downtown routes. I assume most of the splatter is from other vehicles, and yet it's always so shocking being on a bus, instead of a streetcar, in the winter, with it often so heavy that you can't see out the window - which I've never experienced on a streetcar.
So the gunk is coming off the buses itself?It's really bad on the low-floor buses - something about them that gets the winter gunk all over the windows in no time. Better wheel wells should fix this. The high-floor Orion Vs and the Nova RTS buses don't become translucent boxes like the VIIs do.
It is currently, but part of the justification is how much money they'd be saving with less operators. Presumably once a route is fully converted to Artics they will reduce the frequency.
But how much? If you look at the 2014 TTC Crowding Standards you'll see that the peak standard for 36-seaters they currently use on 7 Bathurst is 51 people compared to 77 on the Nova artic.
If they apply these standards, presumably the AM Peak service would drop from 19 to 13 buses. This would change the frequency from once every 6.3 minutes to once every 9.2 minutes.
For PM Peak service would drop from 22 to 15 buses, changing the frequency from once every 5.5 minutes to once every 8.1 minutes.
That's quite a frequency drop. I wish they were replacing the non-articulated routes almost 1 to 1 on routes where there isn't enough capacity.
Hopefully they're at least getting more reliable.
Ha ha ha!
The Bathurst route is horribly mismanaged with terrible bunching, overcrowding, short-turns and long waits at Bathurst Station. Doing a straight capacity swap will be a disaster, especially without better line management.