cplchanb
Senior Member
the underlying theme in all this is that we are overly reliant on govt handouts for these projects. not sure how but we need to find a way to generate our own cash flows to offset the costs.
The shells on the T1s seem pretty well built. A lot of cities are opting to rebuild older stock to modern standards, because trains used to be built to last, example:Rebuilding the T1's means replacing all the electronics, the interiors, but also refitting the trains for ATC and likely rebuilding the cabs as well. Ideally, with ATC we would be running the trains driver-less, but at least, we have shifted to OPTO (one person train operation). In so doing, however, the drivers, require camera monitors in the cabs to see the length of the train in lieu of the guard.
Maybe, but we still need more vehicles for the YNSE, as well as to maintain higher headways thanks to ATC. Plus we have the Sheppard Subway happening... at some point.An earlier plan didn't require new trains, if they short-turned half of them at Kennedy.
I don’t think this rebuild is necessarily a bad thing, as @Northern Light points out:
The shells on the T1s seem pretty well built. A lot of cities are opting to rebuild older stock to modern standards, because trains used to be built to last, example:
Helsinki’s M100 metro trains are being rebuilt this way to last at least into the 2030s:
Exterior, before:
Source
After:
Source
Interior, before:
Source
After:
Source
Everything ”under the hood” has been changed.
All that matters is the extent of the rebuild…
I haven't noticed Bakerloo train issues when I'm there - any more than other lines. Well other than someone fainting on board at Oxford Circus, when it wasn't hot.
Sure, it's not ideal. But I don't see another outcome, if the province is both going to limit the cities debt, and not provide funding.
Thank you for the correction! I’m well aware of their failed, joint automization venture with Nuremberg. Somehow it worked there though…The M100's were not refitted for Automatic Train Control; Should that project proceed in Helsinki the M100's will have to be retired (there is no intention to refit them again); the current projected retirement date is 2030.
And with Metrolinx foisting the “T” logo on all of us (yes - it’s still a stupid idea) we’re going to resemble Boston for all the wrong reasons.Welcome to Rick Leary’s world. He’s putting in quite the effort to bring the MBTA to the TTC, must be longing for the tardy service and infrastructure found in Boston.
If the equipment was properly refurbished, it wouldn't be a problem. It's only a problem because they failed to do a proper refurbishment on the equipment and then use it long past its expiration date.hasnt this been the mantra of transit in toronto/canada? scrape out every last second of operational life and do refurb over refurb instead of proactive replacement?
look at via rail for example on their HEP dinos.
if only ttc doesnt need to rely mainly on govt handouts..
true - but service life is usually the period of time when a rolling stock performs consistently at a reliable level.
The 51 year old Bakerloo line trains are literally rusting away, and London has a central government that doesn't care enough to fund replacements...
Welcome to Rick Leary’s world. He’s putting in quite the effort to bring the MBTA to the TTC, must be longing for the tardy service and infrastructure found in Boston. His disbelief in ATC led to indecisiveness on the project for the BD Line.
Just to add, if the SSE opens in 2030, the youngest T1s will only be ~29 years old (1995-2001 procurement). It would be a shame not to do a proper refurbishment on them.If the equipment was properly refurbished, it wouldn't be a problem. It's only a problem because they failed to do a proper refurbishment on the equipment and then use it long past its expiration date.
NB: even if the funding for the new rolling stock was assured, it would be wise to do a proper refurbishment of the T1s anyway, because the future is unpredictable. As we saw with the CLRVs, a new vehicle being on the way doesn't mean you can just stop investing in the old ones.
I think they'd very much have to, if there's no order in place at that point.Just to add, if the SSE opens in 2030, the youngest T1s will only be ~29 years old (1995-2001 procurement). It would be a shame not to do a proper refurbishment on them.
Hopefully, but I'd be surprised.With the new mayor in town, it will take her time to change things around with a hope she shows Rick Leary’ the door. Then we could end up with someone worse.